Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorenzo Cappiello
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 01:37, 4 May 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 01:37, 4 May 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:31, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lorenzo Cappiello, Non è un mistero (Lorenzo Cappiello (EP), Non è un mistero, Lorenzo (CD), No es ningún misterio
[edit]- Lorenzo Cappiello (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Vanity, no google references aside from the blog and the information listed on the pages is questionable. --fvw* 16:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per nom. Google.it brings up a fair number of Lorenzo Cappiello hits, but they don't seem to be relevant. If the songs were going Gold and Platinum over the past year, they'd be mentioned online.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all. Uncited, no Google references. Numerous removals of the AfD template on the page indicate a non-cooperative author. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment All citations added by the author to Non è un mistero have failed verification. Nineteen failed verifications constitutes vandalism, to my thinking. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:16, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a known vandal on it.wiki. He got an infinite block for nonsense contribution, he created only hoaxes and multiple sockpuppets. The entries reported here are all blocked because of repeated creation. Here is the link to the discussion, and here his known SP. Just to clear the whole situation. Thanks, --Gliu 20:10, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment All citations added by the author to Non è un mistero have failed verification. Nineteen failed verifications constitutes vandalism, to my thinking. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:16, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.