Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aidoo (Web Framework)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 15:14, 2 April 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 15:14, 2 April 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LFaraone 02:38, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Aidoo (Web Framework) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No notability expressed, and apparent conflict of interest as per m:User:COIBot/XWiki/soleit.ru — billinghurst sDrewth 16:00, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Let me comment on conflict of interest as per m:User:COIBot/XWiki/soleit.ru:
- Sole IT, LLC is IT company who created Aidoo Web Framework. Of course, corporate website and the Aidoo's website are on same hosting (Hostgator) and has same IP
- Sole IT developed Vitotel (hotel management web application) with Aidoo. And Vitotel website is also on same hosting as Sole IT website
Should I remove some links to avoid conflict of interest mentioned above?
Also Aidoo is just another one web framework which will be opensource shortly. Why not to save information about it in Wikipedia? — Leonid Lapidus 18:00, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable software article with no RS references; created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 00:34, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Look up here, please:[[1]]. Cite:
Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, especially in articles about themselves
What RS should we have for article about Aidoo except the website and developer website? — Leonid Lapidus 10:39, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unable to find any coverage in reliable sources independant of the subject. J04n(talk page) 11:49, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.