Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatemeh Naghavi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 10:28, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fatemeh Naghavi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Long-term unsourced BLP with little or no notability. The Wordsmith^Communicate 21:48, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:03, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:03, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Already added 4 sources in quick measure, appears to be quote notable Iranian actress, to the extent that you can even find sources in English. I added Persian spelling to the article for help in finding Persian news sources, which are also out there.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 06:03, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:ENT which says that the actress should have "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions". The only notable film of Fatemeh Naghavi is The Circle (Dayereh), and it's not enough at all to pass notability guideline.Farhikht (talk) 13:26, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why is that the only notable one? I found sources that relate to other films she is in as well in leading roles?--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 14:09, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you tell the title of another film in which she took a leading role?Farhikht (talk) 17:50, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here's one, i think? [1]. (A play?) I'm no expert.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 18:00, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's a play. Still think that she is not notable enough!Farhikht (talk) 17:02, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The nominator's concern with it originally having no sources has now been addressed, and in considering how little coverage of Iranian film and TV makes it outside that media-controlled cointry, I am pleased to note that she has found western coverage in news and books.[2][3] I'm satisfied that she meets WP:PEOPLE through application of both WP:GNG and WP:ENT. And as en.Wikipedia does not require that notability be world-wide, or even Western-wide, kudos to Milowent for digging through the available sources. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:46, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
keep per Milowent. JoshuaZ (talk) 04:14, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.