Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TI Personal Problem Solver Series
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 17:28, 28 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 17:28, 28 March 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 12:43, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- TI Personal Problem Solver Series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I've tried to clean this up, but I don't think there's an article once you take out everything that's unreferenced (or only referenced to the original editor's own website) or against BLP. Dori (Talk • Contribs) 23:16, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Some of the problems are noted at Talk:VisiCalc/Archives/2016#Problems with the TI story and other issues, as Dvandusen, the original editor of this article, once tried to put the same information into VisiCalc.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Dori (Talk • Contribs) 23:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I concur that the whole section on Visicalc is a BLP issue and implies that the design was swiped from TI. This is not supported by any reliable sources in the article or on the web. The only references are to the article creator's web site. -- Whpq (talk) 20:30, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:59, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The article revolves around allegations made only by the author. yandman 10:01, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- A sad story. TI's product could have been a contender, maybe. But no reliable sources. Aymatth2 (talk) 03:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 03:58, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.