Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jhirak.camel (talk | contribs) at 12:15, 5 March 2022. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Main pageTalk pageSubmissions
Category, Sorting, Feed		ShowcaseParticipants
Apply, By subject		Reviewing instructions
Help deskBacklog
drives
Shortcuts
Welcome to the Articles for Creation help desk

  • This page is only for questions about article submissions—are you in the right place?
  • Do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page.
  • Watch out for scammers! If someone contacts you saying that they can get your draft published for payment, they are trying to scam you. Report such attempts here.
Ask a new question
Please check back often for answers.
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions


February 27

08:01:22, 27 February 2022 review of submission by Billapartygang123

Anybody, please check my draft and approve it for an article I have done extensive changes in it. Billapartygang123 (talk) 08:01, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Billapartygang123 Please do not make repeated requests. Since your draft was rejected, you must appeal to the last reviewer. 331dot (talk) 08:05, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

19:13:37, 27 February 2022 review of submission by Shadysbook


I am requesting this article to be published because the organization is one of the prominent fertility healthcare institutions in India. We have other players in India "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Hospitals", "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yashoda_Hospitals" who has the Wikipedia pages that represent healthcare development. Many of the Indians are not able to understand the importance of fertility, fertility rates, and fertility hospitals that can help them to undergo treatments.

Please check this link: https://datacommons.org/tools/timeline#&place=country/IND&statsVar=FertilityRate_Person_Female Which says the need for fertility hospitals that help many couples move on generations. This is an important issue and I am trying to educate everyone with the help of starting the article on one of the institutes now and proceeding to update further and this wing too. The share articles and hyperlinks are valid and authenticated in our newspapers, magazines and has great coverage across India. Please review this: https://oasisindia.in/news-and-media/#1632389651208-8ef00ffb-ba82

Kindly let me know how else can I add and improvise the article to ensure that this goes live.

Shadysbook (talk) 19:13, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shadysbook The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Please read other stuff exists. Not every organization merits an article, even in the same field. It depends on the coverage in independent reliable sources, and there does not seem to be the coverage here. 331dot (talk) 19:22, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 28

05:14:54, 28 February 2022 review of draft by 122.160.153.168


122.160.153.168 (talk) 05:14, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I have added secondary reference to the draft page PERICENT, still it is rejected. I want to know the valid reason behind this.

I just declined the draft as blatant advertising! "to rapidly deliver powerful business process applications." " stands tall with a decade of experience in delivering workflow" "with that deep passion for technology" Theroadislong (talk) 09:11, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir

Can you please explain the reason behind not publishing my draft in detail

so that I can change them accordingly.122.160.153.168 (talk) 10:19, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further, and no amount of editing can change that. The reasons have been given on the draft. 331dot (talk) 10:21, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For further comment, please edit this existing section, instead of creating additional sections. 331dot (talk) 10:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As my submission is rejected , I have to create new page or do changes on previous page— Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.160.153.168 (talk • contribs)
Rejection means that it cannot be resubmitted in any form. 331dot (talk) 09:20, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

12:42:24, 28 February 2022 review of draft by Jackjohn15


Jackjohn15 (talk) 12:42, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

13:18:39, 28 February 2022 review of submission by Slmer

Hello, Service Lifecycle Management(SLM) is the subset of Product Lifecycle Management that deals with after sales stage of a product. I think it should be part of Wikipedia for the following reasons: 1) Leading commercial Product Lifecycle Management(PLM) software vendors like Siemens Digital Industries Software, PTC and others refer to SLM as a domain within their PLM offering 2) There is already an SLM article in Wikipedia in German language and it makes sense to have one in English as well(https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service-Lifecycle-Management). 3) SLM is being referred to as a phase of PLM in the PLM article of Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_lifecycle#Phase_4:_Service) 4) It represents a real approach of handling service data as part of the complete product lifecycle management

The current article is basic, but for the reasons above I think it represents a real topic, not a marketing trend, with actual need and a set of commercial vendors investing in solutions of that need. Hence I am kindly asking re-review of the article.

Many thanks

Slmer (talk) 13:18, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Slmer The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. That other language Wikipedias have a particular article does not necessarily mean this one should. Each langauge version of Wikipedia is its own project, with their own editors and policies. What is acceptable on one version is not necessarily acceptable on another. Regarding the draft itself, the sources do little more than define the term. They are not significant coverage of discussion of this terminology. 331dot (talk) 13:23, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

13:22:39, 28 February 2022 review of submission by Antikcha Moran


Antikcha Moran (talk) 13:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy link Draft:Dr. Bidyananda Borkakoti --Orange Mike | Talk 01:57, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 15:46:59, 28 February 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Simona.lamba


Hi, my first article has been rejected...I´m working on it again and would like to know: • What is the specific criteria for when a sentence or piece of information requires a citation? • Are internal citations (i.e. links back to your own website) acceptable, or should they be avoided.

Thanks a lot!

Simona.lamba (talk) 15:46, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Simona.lamba Just noting that it was only declined, not rejected. Rejected would mean it could not be reconsidered. 331dot (talk) 15:49, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To answer your question, a Wikipedia article must primarily summarize what independent reliable sources say about the topic. Every substantive claim should have a citation(i.e not something like the sky being blue). 331dot (talk) 15:50, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

18:38:43, 28 February 2022 review of draft by Elonadam


Hello, Elmedin mot left Screen Media to join Eurovia! (As you can see at official web site http://screenmedia.mk/new/?p=4501 )

Elonadam (talk) 18:38, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

19:11:46, 28 February 2022 review of draft by Tobyhoward


Hi, I am a long-time WikiGnome and have now written my first article (about the 1980 TV movie "The Hard Way"). The reviewer has declined the draft article with the comment "This draft lacks Reception information, such as reviews. Please expand with Reception information." This is perfectly fair, and I would like to fix this. My question is: what reviews would be considered acceptable? I cannot find any 1980 reviews from the likes of Variety, Hollywood Reporter, etc, and this is not surprising because this TV movie made little impact at the time and then disappeared. There are plenty of "viewer" reviews though (IMDb etc). Would these be acceptable to quote? What makes this movie notable for Wikipedia, IMHO, is that it featured two major stars, Patrick McGoohan and Lee Van Cleef, and has now become a cult movie attracting a lot of discussion (it is now available on DVD). I'd appreciate any advice! Thank you! -- Toby

Tobyhoward (talk) 19:11, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tobyhoward IMBD is not acceptable as a source as it is user-editable- even if it were, the reviews by ordinary people lack significance; we would need reviews by professional or at least recognized reviewers/critics. Note that a topic is typically not notable by association with notable people. 331dot (talk) 19:33, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

my identity

this is who I am and I dont want people claiming my pictures or my birthday or my identity. this is the reason why im coming to wikiepedia because too many strangers are claiming to be me. 19:35:26, 28 February 2022 review of submission by Rosa Lopez Hurtado Rosa Lopez Hurtado (talk) 19:36, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


im Rosa Lopez Hurtado its my identity im not sharing my legacy with strangers. I just want respect Ive been disrespected and humilliated in facebook because alot of females want my pictures and they also want my identity. Rosa Lopez Hurtado (talk) 19:44, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What does any of this have to do with the Wikipedia? ValarianB (talk) 19:47, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Rosa Lopez Hurtado I think you are confused about what Wikipedia is. This is not social media for people to write about themselves; this is an encyclopedia where independent editors write about various topics. If you have issues with Facebook, please contact Facebook regarding them. If your identity is being stolen, please contact your local authorities. 331dot (talk) 19:49, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:34:25, 28 February 2022 review of submission by The Royal Kingdom of Igboland

Hello. I am requesting assistance because my article was declines and the reason why doesn't make sense. The feedback was reliable, independent sources were needed however, this is exactly what I provided. Please help or review again. The Royal Kingdom of Igboland (talk) 22:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy link Draft:Amaka The Igbo Princess --Orange Mike | Talk 01:55, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 22:45:21, 28 February 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Hemantshah19


I am requesting assistance because I am still in my learning phase & I believe that this article on International Railway Summit is important for the global rail enthusiast as on this platform global railway leaders discuss the emerging rail technology and shaping the future rail industry.

[1]

https://shift2rail.org/calendar/international-railway-summit-3/

http://www.cer.be/events/international-events/10th-international-railway-summit

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:3rd_International_Railway_Summit

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2016_Christian_Kern_Railway_Summit.jpg

https://uic.org/com/enews/article/11th-international-railway-summit-to-debate-innovation-for-people-planet-and

https://www.railway-technology.com/features/new-trends-integrated-data-management-lessons-irs/

https://www.railway-technology.com/features/new-trends-integrated-data-management-lessons-irs/

https://www.railwaypro.com/wp/transport-leaders-reiterate-rail-transport-importance-to-fight-climate-change/

https://www.mobility.siemens.com/global/en/insights/railway-summit-2021-net-zero-mobility.html </ref> Hemantshah19 (talk) 22:45, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://europa.eu/year-of-rail/events/10th-international-railway-summit_en https://www.itf-oecd.org/international-railway-summit

Hemantshah19 (talk) 22:45, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

23:26:20, 28 February 2022 review of submission by BuySomeApples

Hi Folks! Is the reason this was rejected because I need new/different references? Or because the business is not that famous? PECO is a cornerstone in industrial die casting and has been a major Oregon Manufacturer since 1938. Thanks for any more feedback! :-) Mottsarah (talk) 23:26, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mottsarah, Its that the article includes zero independent reliable sources. Please see WP:NCORP for further information.Slywriter (talk) 23:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


March 1

01:20:18, 1 March 2022 review of submission by WillsEdtior777

Draft:Da_Vinci_(magazine) WillsEdtior777 (talk) 01:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

09:29:52, 1 March 2022 review of draft by Cyuppyworld


09:29:52, 1 March 2022 review of submission by Cyuppyworld



May I know how can I improve this article to make it publish? I have made disclose as well. Thank you.

Cyuppyworld (talk) 09:29, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the propper code allowing you to submit the draft for review, however, submitting the draft at this time would be a waste of time as it would not be accepted. Wikipedia is not interested in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Wikipedia is only interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable sources. Please see MOS:WORDS. Victor Schmidt (talk) 10:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:13:16, 1 March 2022 review of submission by 183.83.161.112


183.83.161.112 (talk) 14:13, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

cinema
cinematographer


Murali MohanKasthala (born on 11 September 1996) is an Indian cinematographer primarily known for his work in the Telugu film industry. He began his career with assistant cinematographer with Om Namo Venkatesaya (2017) under the cinematographer of S Gopal Reddy And continued as associate cinematographer for Anando Brahma (2017) under the cinematographer of Anish Tharunkumar And worked as associate cinematographer for Rangasthalam(2018) under the cinematographer of R Ratnavelu and worked as associate cinematographer for Arjun Suravaram(2019)under the cinematographer of Surya. And as a cinematographer he completed Gentleman (2020 film) under the direction of Jadesh Kumar Hampi and going on with Model Telugu film (2021) as cinematographer under the direction of Murali K maddirala

Totally unsourced and rejected. Theroadislong (talk) 18:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:55:14, 1 March 2022 review of draft by Sachitj


Dear editors, it is not possible to understand clearly what you expect me to improve in my page, I have provided two references from reliable news papers, If I am not doing in the right way, kindly please do it yourself. Requesting you to make it easy to understand for common people to follow easy steps and make Wikipedia more rich of information. Thanks!!

Sachitj (talk) 14:55, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there are two sources in Draft:Devendra Khandelwal. One of them mentions that he is the chairman of the IIMC, and the other one says that he has shot eighteen documentaries about Mahatma Gandhi, and that he has been a judge for the National Award and the Screen Film Awards. But the draft contains a lot more information, about things like his education, his date of birth, his production company, and so on. Where does that information come from? A biographical article about a living person has particularly strong requirements for sourcing – as you were told last time you asked about this draft. Sources need to be independent, secondary, and provide in-depth coverage of the person (not just a mention of his name). And in addition, the draft is still very promotionally written, so it would not be accepted for that reason, either. --bonadea contributions talk 17:31, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

15:28:42, 1 March 2022 review of submission by Snehil4


I have tried creating this page for 5-6 times and every time it gets rejected or deleted. I am not able to understand the problem here so please help me out here. My college (IIT Delhi) is organizing a technical fest and I am given the job to create a wiki page for the fest but I am not able to do so. Snehil4 (talk) 15:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A university fest or gathering is most likely not going to be notable enough to justify an encyclopedia article. ValarianB (talk) 18:19, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16:48:37, 1 March 2022 review of submission by Sanskriti88

Please advise whether the article is natural and is notable as per coverage in secondary source for this thought leadership on the real situation! Sanskriti88 (talk) 16:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was rejected as blatant advertising. Theroadislong (talk) 17:06, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Garbage language like "breakthrough company" "disrupted itself" "thought leadership company" "solid foundation of digital transformation" "bringing disruption" and "helping to well-known global companies" mean you're writing an advertisement, and one apparently aimed at corporate morons who are drawn to buzzwords as flies are drawn to fresh excrement. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:21, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

21:13:12, 1 March 2022 review of submission by 2001:56A:7780:8000:DC7A:F87F:CA61:5CCA


2001:56A:7780:8000:DC7A:F87F:CA61:5CCA (talk) 21:13, 1 March 2022 (UTC) my thing was declined :(([reply]

Unless you can link to the draft in question we can't offer any advice. We're not psychic. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:17, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


March 2

00:59:27, 2 March 2022 review of submission by Mapotakes API


Mapotakes API (talk) 00:59, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

07:03:35, 2 March 2022 review of submission by Mesbahfarag


Mesbahfarag (talk) 07:03, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to publish an article about my company profile with all data. this request had been rejected around 3 times every time i find a missing info from m,y side, yet the last time I upload the article also had been rejected please let me know ASAP what should i do and if you have any tutorial videos about how to create an article and publish it share it with me.

Mesbahfarag please see WP:PAID FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 18:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

07:10:31, 2 March 2022 review of submission by 2600:1700:F920:8E0:6D49:4813:2405:FF6E

This is for my Roblox myth I really need it to grow!! please. 2600:1700:F920:8E0:6D49:4813:2405:FF6E (talk) 07:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a self-promotion tool. Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

08:12:58, 2 March 2022 review of submission by Sk Wasim Akram 13

This article have enough notation, he is an Music Artist, Youtuber with over 1 milliion subscriber and also we saw him in various reality show as a dancer. Link from TimesOfIndia News Website: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/videos/tv/hindi/indias-best-dancer-finalist-mukul-gain-on-his-journey-competition-and-more/videoshow/79324478.cms

Sk Wasim Akram 13 (talk) 08:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sk Wasim Akram 13 I reviewed it. I also note the image on Commons has debatable licencing.
Are you in any way associated with Mukul Gain? FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 17:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

09:02:59, 2 March 2022 review of submission by Shadysbook


Help us to take this live. Any other information that might help us to take this live

Shadysbook (talk) 09:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shadysbook Who is "us"? If you represent or work for Oasis Fertility, that must be declared per the Terms of Use, see WP:PAID. Only a single person should be operating your account.
Please see my reply from February 27 above. The draft will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 09:23, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:25:07, 2 March 2022 review of submission by MooseMelon

Why was the draft page "Krismas" denied????????????? I would like to know changes i cold make so i can improve my draft! Thank You!!! MooseMelon (talk) 14:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MooseMelon No improvement is possible, that is what rejected means. Wikipedia is not a place to just tell about something. Please see the five pillars and Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 14:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:48:14, 2 March 2022 review of draft by Llouest


Question: Hi, why my draft on the American impressionist painter 'William Samuel Horton' (Draft:William Samuel Horton), started on November 21, and progressively perfected in the meantime, is still not approved? The reviewer, nicknamed 'Hoary', had initially commented that there are not enough serious references, which is odd as I included in my draft many more official references on this artist's life and work that what there has been in the Wikipedia French article on this person (to which I also added myself some missing references) which has been published on the French Wikipedia for over two years. Please advise, Regards, Llouest Llouest (talk) 14:48, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

15:56:14, 2 March 2022 review of submission by MooseMelon


We changed around a couple of things to make it seem more Wikipedia-like. We tried to clean it up and hope you will re-review it.

MooseMelon (talk) 15:56, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MooseMelon: please see the response to your previous inquiry, it already said no amount of editing can the make subject notable. The only thing that could make it notable for Wikipedia is reliable sources talking about it in published media. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:03, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16:16:10, 2 March 2022 review of submission by KenKaneki1803


Hi there, I just submitted a descriptive article named "Tryst - IIT Delhi" from my account "KenKaneki1803". Earlier the article submitted by my subordinate was deleted several times, due to the reasons that I am yet to figure. Now when I myself tried to submit the content after making suitable changes, the reviewer thinks that I am the same person creating multiple accounts. I want you to know that I am a different individual, and henceforth request you to please assist me in making this submission possible.

KenKaneki1803 (talk) 16:16, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@KenKaneki1803 We have no interest in anything you or your subordinates wish to say about what appears to be your company or employer. That is against the purpose of Wikipedia. We care only about what is recorded in independent reliable sources.
You appear to be blocked as a Sockpuppet. You are also a WP:PAID editor. This is an amateur project. Paid editors need to behave much better than this. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 17:30, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

18:36:47, 2 March 2022 review of draft by Dougwill2


Preparing article about American inventor with 31 patents from 1899 - 1930, listed in table with #, Pub date, Title, Applicant, Inventor(s). Should I link patent #'s to USPTO database (scanned images and text of original patent) or Google patent database (scanned images and searchable text); or both?

Dougwill2 (talk) 18:36, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dougwill2 Neither. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state; government documents/records are considered primary sources. The article should only summarize what those independent sources say. 331dot (talk) 18:45, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:53:27, 2 March 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by SteveJClay


Hi, I require help with my article. can some please help me?

SteveJClay (talk) 18:53, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

19:10:45, 2 March 2022 review of draft by Dougwill2


Per prior inquiry re patent links: the noted patent table IS a summary table, following a fully-referenced bio article. If a reader wishes to see details of a particular patent doc it is easier to have a ready link available than none. But your comment is useful, as it states Wiki ranks gov sources like USPTO over Google, even tho Google's searchable text may have more utility. Thx.

Dougwill2 (talk) 19:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dougwill2: Both of them are useless - We treat government documents as primary sources, and in almost all circumstances Google and other search engines cannot provide enough detail to cite. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:20, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

21:12:45, 2 March 2022 review of draft by Bocarlson10


Hello, 9 months ago I created a draft article for an organization, Global Americans. To comply with the notability guidelines, I included a few independent, secondary, reliable sources, but the article was rejected for a lack of independent sources. I've now added several more independent, secondary, and reliable sources with significant coverage. These include a staff-written article in Forbes, which is recognized as a reliable source in the perennial sources list. Most of the references are from Spanish-language media, so they are not yet on the perennial sources list. These include Milenio, Las 2 Orillas, Voice of America, Perfil, and El Financiero—a Mexican periodical whose partner company, Bloomberg, is on the perennial sources list. Would you let me know if these sources will qualify the article for publication? If not, please let me know what other edits I should make! Thank you.

Bocarlson10 (talk) 21:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bocarlson10: Please refer to User:Jéské Couriano/Decode:
I don't see any of the non-routine, in-depth independent coverage with competent editorial oversight and identifiable authors that we're looking for. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jéské Couriano: Thank you for the detailed and prompt reply, Jéské! I will hold off on resubmitting the article for publication. If other, reliable sources publish significant coverage on the organization in the coming months to establish notability, I will edit and resubmit.

March 3

08:38:32, 3 March 2022 review of submission by Sethboyk2

Have had the draft for this page rejected, suggestion is that the references are 'passing' as far as i can tell each of the references are from independent press publications and directly relate to the topic referenced, none of the articles are sponsored or paid for and as far as I can tell the company has at least as significant presence in the industry and sport as other companies already present on Wikipedia, any help appreciated!

Sethboyk2 (talk) 08:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sethboyk2 The draft was only declined, not rejected. Rejected would mean it could not be resubmitted, but a decline means that it can be submitted. Please understand that each draft is judged on its own merits, and the existence of other articles has no bearing on this one. It could be that these other articles you have seeen are also inappropriate and simply not addressed yet. This is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, so it is possible to get inappropriate articles by us. See other stuff exists.
The issue is not necessarily the specific sources themselves, but their content. The first source you give is based on interviews and a tour of the company factory given by the company. The second source describe the manufacturing process they use and has very little about the company itself. The third is based on an interview with the company founder; interviews are primary sources and do not establish notability. The fourth source is a promotional piece about the company, written by someone invited in by the company. The fifth is a brief profile-like entry about the company, not significant coverage. The last sources seems to describe a new type of helmet technology and mentions the company little(from what I could tell, it is lengthy).
A Wikipedia article must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Please read Your First Article. I see that other than one edit twelve years ago, you have exclusively edited about this company. If you have a connection to this company, please read about conflict of interest and paid editing for information on required formal disclosures. 331dot (talk) 10:08, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

11:12:40, 3 March 2022 review of submission by Vandanadhasmana


Vandanadhasmana (talk) 11:12, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have copied it from my own website. it is my company website and I have written the article for the same.

Vandanadhasmana Yes, we don't want you to do that. Wikipedia is not a place for a company to tell the world about itself, it is for summarizing what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Articles are typically written by independent editors wholly unconnected with the subject. Your company website is the proper place for you to tell the world about your company.
The Wikipedia Terms of Use require you to formally declare your paid editing relationship, see WP:PAID, as well as WP:COI. 331dot (talk) 11:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

15:09:35, 3 March 2022 review of submission by NoelNixon2005

Hi Sir. The film got officially announced yesterday and here is the article https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/pathan-teaser-shah-rukh-khan-calls-india-his-religion-deepika-padukone-john-abraham-7797100/ NoelNixon2005 (talk) 15:09, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NoelNixon2005 As the reviewer said, films generally do not merit articles before their release. See WP:NFF. The only exceptions would be if there is some aspect of the production of the film itself that receives significant coverage and is notable, beyond mere announcements of casting, crew, the commencement of principal photography, etc. An example of that is Rust (suspended film). As the draft was rejected, it will not be considered further. Once the film is released, it will then be notable and you may resubmit this then. 331dot (talk) 15:16, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

15:30:42, 3 March 2022 review of submission by Kishore pathikonda


Am Kishore pathikonda actor Pavan acharya "S big fan I have written about him draft article but his draft has been declined I have given all information about him in draft but not accepted are they didn't moved to article space so kindly approve it his Wikipedia's draft and moved page to article space Even I have given reliable sources but not accepted so kindly fix this issue

Thank you Regards Pavan Acharya Film actor and Telivesion actor

Kishore pathikonda (talk) 15:30, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kishore pathikonda Please read the autobiography policy; while not forbidden, it is strongly advised that people not attempt to write about themselves. There are also reasons that an article about you is not necessarily a good thing. It appears that you do not meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable actor, as shown with significant coverage in independent reliable sources. 331dot (talk) 15:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
IMDB is not a reliable source. Wikidata is not a reliable source. (Google) Searches are never a reliable source, due to their dynamics (Individual search results might be). The Morning Herald Piece is a repub of a press release. The Times of India links are dead (and it isn't particularely reliable anyway. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16:55:20, 3 March 2022 review of submission by 2601:18E:8201:7B50:806F:263C:209C:4184

I request this draft be re-reviewed - Draft:Peter Gena (without re-submitting) for the reason that the editor who declined cited "non-reliable sources" - unreliable sources may, in this draft according to this rejection, include The New York Times, National Podcast by national journalist and cultural figure Studs Terkel (who is a living figure on Wikipedia), the library archives of the State University of New York, Buffalo - collected papers of this living composer, and the French government, and others. It was a bizarre rejection on that basis. I wrote most of the article and could not parse how The New York Times and SUNY Buffalo, The French Government, and others are perceived as inadequate sources. Can you? A lot of articles would need to be taken down under those editorial decisions. :) I would also ask for a review of this editor for their editing privileges. They did not provide other reasoning of merit. I look forward to the exchange, especially with respect to the NYT, French Government, SUNY Buffalo, Studs Terkel, The Chicago Reader, and other rejected, unreliable sources. Thank you. 2601:18E:8201:7B50:806F:263C:209C:4184 (talk) 16:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All references to his own website should be removed. In most cases the issues are not with the sources themeselves, but their content. If the coverage is not significant enough, the person would not merit an article. Please describe your three best independent reliable sources below. 331dot (talk) 17:11, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are actually only two brief references to his website? Including one that is a record of a book? I suppose that could just be the publisher's website of the book? The only thing on the page is the book's publishing info. You ask for the three best independent reliable sources.

1. This is from the State University of Buffalo of New York. It is this composer's archive at a university library, i.e. his collected papers preserved for posterity. It lists numerus items including scores, letters, photographs and serves to validate the fact that this composer is both a historic figure by nature of having an institutional archive of merit in perpetuity (or at least as long as the university exists, it is part of New York state as a state in the US, I guess you could both check the Department of Education in the Federal government to confirm New York's eduation department and also the Constitution to confirm that New York is part of the USA to confirm viability overseen by the Department of Education. In all serious! Here is the link to New York's SUNY BUFFALO ARCHIVE OF PETER GENA: https://www.empireadc.org/search/catalog/nbuumu_ubmu0085

2. The New York Times. Widely known throughout the world as the best English language newspaper, but refer to Wikipedia article for further verification of The New York Times, maybe they were from another country that has not heard of the paper. https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1982/07/08/260913.html?pageNumber=60

3. It was hard to choose a third, but I would the Studs Terkel about Podcast about John Cage, see Wikipedia, one of America's most important composers, and also the importance and validity of Studs Terkel (again see Wikipedia).

To me, the most profound verification is in the archive at SUNY Buffalo. In general, if an archive at a university has been dedicated to your life and work, it presumes international and national importance, and also provide bounteous documentation. The other sources in addition to the New York Times and the Studs Terkel broadcast mostly back up biographical material and also proof of the importance of the research importance of his work as a professor for 40 years, as well as document his work producing major musical festivals in the 1980s.

The coverage complaint was superficial without commentary, which is why I ask that the editor's privileges be reviewed. There is no further commentary explaining or discussing what coverage is or is not significant and how the article can provide acceptable "coverage". ""Coverage" as a term strikes me as something that amounts to "media coverage" on the internet - I am not sure I have ever heard of books, recordings, inclusions in museums and exhibitions, and archives referred to as "coverage". Have you? In any case, without inventing new meanings for words, let's assume the editor meant "a variety of credible sources" by abbreviation. I believe the sources referred to, in addition to those cited in the article are more than enough to establish functional meaning for publication. 2 out of 12 sources refer to the composer's website, maybe 1/6 is too much? I think a lot of articles would have to be deleted if this formula of percentiles was used. However, if the references should be deleted, I will do that now, the information is duplicated elsewhere. The prospect of removing personal websites as sources across Wikipedia will require a great deal of editing and I will only be able to do this draft, I hope that is ok! 2601:18E:8201:7B50:B876:D611:3420:333E (talk) 18:51, 4 March 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18E:8201:7B50:B876:D611:3420:333E (talk) 18:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see that the Studs Terkel podcast is not a source for Wikipedia. So, it has been removed as a source and only used as an external link. There are so many other sources that are reliable, but I suppose I would go with the Chicago Reader, as it has a circulation of several million and online access, the latter of which seems to be the relevant reference for the online encyclopedia. But, you could also go with any number of the academic papers on JSTOR or the important Lovely Music record label recordings or articles by Kyle Gann as sourced or otherwise. 2601:18E:8201:7B50:B876:D611:3420:333E (talk) 19:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to User:Jéské Couriano/Decode:
You have some good here, but this touches on an area where I have erred in the past (i.e. WP:NACADEMIC notability claims) and so I will defer to someone who has considerably more experience with such matters. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • NYT is a rundown of the festival acts. However, NYT does not mention the subject by name and that entire paragraph is a bit of WP:SYNTH using the three references. Didn't review anything else, just saw that the NYT wasn't evaluated. Oh and for WP:NACADEMIC, google scholar is useful to see how often they are cited by others.Slywriter (talk) 21:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20:28:07, 3 March 2022 review of submission by Hanaan dar

The page is about a movie, which is now announced, I request humbly, to review the page once again.

Hanaan dar (talk) 20:28, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20:41:11, 3 March 2022 review of draft by Mobius Gerig


So, I made a draft for the Atlantic hurricane season after this season, and I want to know when it would be feasible to put the draft up to review. I do not want to be a too-sooner again. Not that's too bad when it happens once, but still.
Mobius Gerig (talk) 20:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20:46:06, 3 March 2022 review of submission by Leon04ni

My draft got rejected. this is my first article that ive written and Im not entirely sure why it was rejected, if I could have some extra clarification that would be really helpful Leon04ni (talk) 20:46, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leon04ni It was only declined, not rejected, meaning resubmission is possible. Your draft is only sourced to IMDB, which is not a reliable source as it is user editable. Other claims are unsourced. A Wikipedia article about a person must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a person, showing how they meet Wikipedia's special definition of a notable person. All claims about a living person must be sourced, see WP:BLP. 331dot (talk) 20:56, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


March 4

00:11:06, 4 March 2022 review of submission by 73.61.15.86

i am making this page for a friend and everything i say in it is a joke so like can I keep it up for him to be able to see it please 73.61.15.86 (talk) 00:11, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not. Find somewhere else. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 00:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

11:20:28, 4 March 2022 review of submission by 123.208.83.210


123.208.83.210 (talk) 11:20, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hi please check these articles shouldn’t this merit him a article?

Both sources are primary, repeating only what he says about himself. (One of the two sources had been added twice, but the duplicate has been removed). He makes quite a positive impression in terms of what he wants to achieve and why, less so in his provably false claims of being the first reality star in Afghanistan. That does not change the fundamental issue though: until there are sources showing that he meets at least these criteria, there can't be an article about him. --bonadea contributions talk 11:39, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Fair enough boss 11:43, 4 March 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.208.83.210 (talk)

Request on 11:42:24, 4 March 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Jirayeni


Hi, I am start to contributing Wikipedia and my first article about a film producer which her data is available on imdb.com but my referenced data was declined. How can I improve my article to pass review?

Jirayeni (talk) 11:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jirayeni: IMDb is not an acceptable source what-so-ever, and nor are her own website or Iran government websites. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 20:50, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

11:46:39, 4 March 2022 review of submission by Maximivanchuk



Maxim Ivanchuk Is an Ukraine plastic surgeon who is been called "The Father of Microsurgery" for his contributions in the history and development of reconstructive microsurgical procedures.[1] He is a past president of the Ukraine Society for Surgery of the Hand, the International Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery, and the Ukraine Association of Plastic Surgery.He served as a clinical professor of surgery at both Stanford University and the University of California - San Francisco.

References

  1. ^ Article in International Business Times Retrieved 24 February 2022


Maximivanchuk (talk) 11:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Maximivanchuk: This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. One source cannot support an entire artiole of any length, let alone a biography of a living/recently-departed person which requires a strong source for every claim that could be challenged. What is your connexion to Ivanchuk? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 20:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

17:04:27, 4 March 2022 review of draft by Emmy1707


Hello, I have changed the writing style of the article and some sources and would like to know if it is correct now. Thank you very much for feedback.Emmy1707 (talk) 17:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC) Emmy1707 (talk) 17:04, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20:14:16, 4 March 2022 review of submission by DrobertiACDCSGomez2022


DrobertiACDCSGomez2022 (talk) 20:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DrobertiACDCSGomez2022 You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. It is completely unsourced; a Wikipedia article must summarize what independent reliable sources say. 331dot (talk) 20:23, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:17:09, 4 March 2022 review of draft by Spiel


Spiel (talk) 22:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This organization has annual awards of some renown. I made the page initially because of the awards, but also because it is a unique group in New Zealand that supports writers and readers.

Please tell me what else you would like to see here.

Spiel, you seem to be relying mostly on the subject's own words. You need to find independent reliable sources that discuss the subject.Slywriter (talk) 22:23, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


March 5

00:57:52, 5 March 2022 review of submission by Andretan1985

Hello, my draft was declined because it "sounded too much like an advertisement".

First, I'd like to point out that I'm a father whose kid uses the baby product brand that I've written an article about, and I do not have any commercial relationship with the company, and I am not being paid to do this. I really liked the brand, and was looking for further information about the brand on Wiki and discovered it didn't have a page, which inspired me to research and write one.

Having said that, I tried my best to follow Wiki guidelines, ensuring that every fact or assertion made was backed up by credible sources. In researching about the brand, I have deliberately avoided using any material from the brand's own webpages, and I have found a wealth of sources, mostly from national newspapers and government websites. (This brand is quite notable within Singapore and has been reported on often).

I feel that writing about a commercial brand necessarily entails describing it, and that inevitably is going to sound like it's "advertising" the brand if it has some claims to fame or notable achievements. I've tried to mitigate that by sticking to factual assertions of what the brand does, and has accomplished, and I believe I have ensured that every such fact is referenced, to show this is not my assertion or something that comes from the brand's own self-advertisement. I've tried to keep my writing as neutral as possible, only sticking to paraphrasing what has already been said in the sources or newspaper articles that I referenced.

I don't understand therefore how it can still be declined for sounding like an advertisement. I also don't understand why the grounds for declining also includes asking me to ensure my sources are reputable/credible, or even that they are referenced at all. Are national newspapers and government websites not reputable or authoritative enough? Have I not found enough? The Wiki notability guidelines even say three separate sources talking about the subject are enough. I have twenty or so.

How can I improve this further, or what specifically about my writing "sounds like an advertisement", so I can improve it and ensure it meets whatever criteria it falls short of? If it needs toning down, do give me some pointers as to where or how.

I'd really appreciate any help you can give me on how to make this better. Thank you!

Andretan1985 (talk) 00:57, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andretan1985 You spend much of the draft talking about the company's products and their features. If you are writing about about company, the article should summarize what independent reliable sources say about the company itself, not its products. Furthermore, awards do not usually warrant a mention unless the award itself merits an article(like an Academy Award or Tony Award). That the company was on a top selling list of a particular website is meaningless without context. Why is that significant?(rhetorical question) 331dot (talk) 01:06, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

03:10:58, 5 March 2022 review of submission by Dougwill2


Draft Article: Joseph Archibald Williams

I am puzzled by reviewer BuySomeApples comments on March 3 regarding reliable sources in rejecting the above article for wiki publication. The draft article references a scholarly 3-part series (fully researched and footnoted) in a magazine (The Vintage Ford Magazine, in print from 1966 to current day); the USPTO (United States Patent and Trademark Office) patent archives; and Harvard University's case law database. The 1st reference is allowable under Wiki guidelines; the second is an official US government info source; and the 3rd is a highly regarded institutional archive of government case law. Not reliable sources? Pls advise. Thx.

Dougwill2 (talk) 03:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As you have been told before the United States Patent and Trademark Office is a primary source, we require independent sources, also see WP:PATENTS which says "Noting the existence of patents or patent applications is a common form of puffery.... Avoid giving too much emphasis to their existence or contents." Theroadislong (talk) 08:54, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

09:53:13, 5 March 2022 review of submission by Ardakocaa

{{SAFESUBST:Void|

im a musical artist, i want a wikipedia page for my name, what can i do for creating my page?

Ardakocaa (talk) 09:53, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

12:15:25, 5 March 2022 review of draft by Jhirak.camel


Hi, I'm creating a Wiki entry for a woman named Blanche Brenton Carey. How do I add a picture to the Infobox? It wouldn't let me when I tried because I haven't done 10 edits. Is there anything I can do or do I publish without a picture until I've done the 10 edits?

Jhirak.camel (talk) 12:15, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&oldid=1075378636"