Jump to content

Talk:Gate array

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PaulBoddie (talk | contribs) at 00:01, 1 March 2022 (Added observation about contributions.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconElectronics Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk page
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

OK, I did the merge from ULA, but this article still needs some cleanup from someone familiar with the chips, who can also talk like regular people. :>) There is still a bit much jargon that is not quite comprehensible to someone outside of chip design and fab. Thanks!Lisamh 03:19, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Might be useful to cite and quote from New Scientist, for example https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=bvrsJuPd6SUC&pg=PA478 which introduces TI as a supplier, or the sample material from Chris Smith's book: http://www.zxdesign.info/book/bookAnnounce.shtml or Michael Debenham's book: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=4LsgBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA51 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.6.217.39 (talk) 22:01, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to seem officious or anything, but upon reviewing this page, a lot of content was apparently added by Robert Lipp who is himself referenced to an extent in this article. I thought that this generally wasn't a done thing on Wikipedia. Also, a lot of the content doesn't really have the level of citing that seems to be required these days, and I think the article's structure might need some review as well. --PaulBoddie (talk) 00:01, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]