Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikiproject Signal Processing
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:10, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Inactive WikiProject with only one inactive member. Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 08:55, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete or Userfy for its creator. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:08, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - On 08:53, 8 June 2012, Armbrust moved page Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Wikiproject Signal Processing to Wikipedia:Wikiproject Signal Processing.[1] The original page was a 07:32, 22 September 2011 proposal to the WikiProject Council by an editor that hasn't edited since, well, 07:32, 22 September 2011,[2] making the proposal his last edit. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 11:39, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete never passed the proposal stage, why was it moved out of the WikiProject Council's space? 70.24.251.208 (talk) 06:39, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- Because it is misplaced WikiProject and never looked like a proposal. Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 08:17, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- But several proposals look like that. 70.24.251.208 (talk) 08:22, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- Recently I closed roughly 40 such proposals and non of them looked like this. See for example: Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/WikiProject ISS, Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Conservation-restoration and Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Mozilla (2nd nomination). Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 08:31, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- Perhaps I'm misremembering, but I do seem to recall something like 4 or 5 in the last two years like that. ; In any case it was placed into Council's proposal space, so shouldn't it be treated as a malformed proposal? People can mistake the Project creator template with the Proposal creator template. 70.24.251.208 (talk) 08:32, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think so. If you follow the description on WP:COUNCIL/P, than you can't make this mistake. Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 08:39, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- That's just it, not everyone will ever follow the instructions. Though unlike this one, they seemed to have just the framework substed in, with a title and a membership of one, and perhaps a description. As this one was created as a subpage under proposals, that would seem to indicate a malformed proposal, instead of a malplaced wikiproject. 70.24.251.208 (talk) 11:32, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think so. If you follow the description on WP:COUNCIL/P, than you can't make this mistake. Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 08:39, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- Perhaps I'm misremembering, but I do seem to recall something like 4 or 5 in the last two years like that. ; In any case it was placed into Council's proposal space, so shouldn't it be treated as a malformed proposal? People can mistake the Project creator template with the Proposal creator template. 70.24.251.208 (talk) 08:32, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- Recently I closed roughly 40 such proposals and non of them looked like this. See for example: Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/WikiProject ISS, Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Conservation-restoration and Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Mozilla (2nd nomination). Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 08:31, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- But several proposals look like that. 70.24.251.208 (talk) 08:22, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- Because it is misplaced WikiProject and never looked like a proposal. Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 08:17, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per above, malformed, made out of process. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:22, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.