Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PMJS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 12:01, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PMJS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website. damiens.rf 20:40, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Author does not show notability. Stesmo (talk) 17:58, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not seeing any third-party sourcing or in-depth coverage to demonstrate notability. Just another online forum. --DAJF (talk) 00:06, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A Google Group/Listserv which is no doubt crucial to the direct participants but would need wider evidence of encyclopaedic notability. From multiple searches, all I can find is a brief mention in the acknowledgements at the front of Thomas Donald Conlan's "From Sovereign to Symbol" (OUP, via Questia) of his appreciation of feedback from the members of the forum, which confirms the first point but doesn't provide encyclopaedic notability in its own right. AllyD (talk) 07:52, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.