Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Producing editor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NW (Talk) 19:27, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Producing editor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete - Fails WP:N. I am unable to find any reliable sources supporting any notability claims. All sources introduced appear to be self-citations to Mr. Arsenault's activities and non-reliable sources. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:11, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 16:23, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, perhaps without prejudice; non-notable neologism. In response to new possibilities created by non-linear editing, and the extreme speed at which off-line editors can now assemble a television or cinema production, and the new redundancy of producers and writers on certain television programs, the term Producing Editor was created to define this new type of editor who also produces, writes and reports directly to the executive producers with no intermediary. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:37, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This article appears to be an attempt by an editor to create a category that doesn't exist. None of the references actually mentions the term "producing editor", and 3 out of the 4 references are simply links to organizational websites. It is also written in an unencyclopedic style and smacks of OR. Yoninah (talk) 17:51, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is one of those non-positions and not notable, isn't part of the definition of an editor one who produces works to be viewed? --WngLdr34 (talk) 19:02, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is an article created by Richard Arsenault defining a non-notable neologism coined by Richard Arsenault. Can be recreated should it gain any currency or industry acceptance, but Wikipedia should not be used to help it achieve that. pablo_hablo. 21:44, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No indication of notability warranting an article. Shadowjams (talk) 08:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.