Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chakra Linux
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:48, 4 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 05:48, 4 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 07:22, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Chakra Linux (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable software sourced only to its own website (and that won't open). I restored from SD only because of doubts whether it was covered as software, Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:52, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:16, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Let users extend and improve the page, before it's deleted again... Plus the website loads, but it's moving to a new platform these days, thus the problems in opening it. --jmc (talk) 09:28, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Distribution is curretnly in the top 15 at Distrowatch (I know that is just a statistic, nevertheless...). We also have some coverage at the somewhat-reliable Linuxtoday.com [1], two by Distrowatch this and this and also some Softpedia coverage [2], in addition to this tuxmachines one [3]. I know this is not that much, but that's what you reasonably expect from a Linux distro that is not one of the giants (Ubuntu, Fedora, Red Hat, ...) --SF007 (talk) 11:35, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- PS: Although I admit the article was/is terrible, I've improved it somewhat and am happy to improve further if it survives AFD. --SF007 (talk) 11:40, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep Well referenced, and descriptive, I see no guidelines violations. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 16:23, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Popular distribution. --KAMiKAZOW (talk) 16:23, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep What is non-notable? It is a top 20 distro in distrowatch. And it have reviews, its the only half rolling and GTK free linux. That makes it unique. --Dryfit (talk) 16:32, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.