Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FinallySecure
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 11:28, 3 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 11:28, 3 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:21, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- FinallySecure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Declining speedy since it's been around for a year in this form, but taking to AfD. It looks to me like the tagger has been doing good work on "computer security" articles, and I think I agree that having an article on Wikipedia that could be seen as approval of such a product without actual notability could be a bad thing. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 19:18, 21 April 2009 (UTC) - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 19:18, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 19:22, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 19:23, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. This appears to be a real product, but searching Google news archive for it found me a lot of press releases (and news service aggregator reprints of press releases) and little or no coverage that could be considered both independent and reliable. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:20, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, a tech product with minimal notability. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:22, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable, looks spam to me. Cupids wings (talk) 20:39, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.