Wikipedia talk:Editor's index to Wikipedia

This is not the page to ask for help.

This page is for discussion of the Editor's index to Wikipedia page itself, and its subpages. You may be looking for one of the following pages:

Wikipedia:Help desk - For questions about Wikipedia and editing.
Wikipedia:Reference desk - For questions on factual topics (for example: Who is the pope?)

See also:

Wikipedia:Village pump - For policy and technical discussions.
Wikipedia:Resolving disputes - To resolve issues between users.

Wikipedia Help Project‑class High‑importance

	This page is within the scope of the Wikipedia Help Project, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's help documentation for readers and contributors. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. To browse help related resources see the Help Menu or Help Directory. Or ask for help on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you there.Wikipedia HelpWikipedia:Help ProjectTemplate:Wikipedia Help ProjectHelp
Project	This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
High	This page has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Outlines NA‑class

	This page is an outline, a type of article that presents a list of articles or sub-topics related to its subject in a hierarchical form. For the standardized set of outlines on Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines. Outlines are within the scope of WikiProject Outlines, a collaborative effort to improve outlines on Wikipedia. For guidance on building and maintaining outlines, see Wikipedia:Outlines.OutlinesWikipedia:WikiProject OutlinesTemplate:WikiProject OutlinesOutlines
NA	This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Archives

1

Writing

Good writing is based on broad mentality Shubham971996 (talk) 10:38, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Purpose of this index?

How comprehensive or up to date is this page, really? It seems like a gargantuan task, and I'm not sure what the clear benefit is, since when trying to find a page, it's almost always easier to just search the Wikipedia namespace. I'd suggest either finding a way to automate the maintenance of this page, or just marking it as historical and abandoning it. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 08:50, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sdkb, I concur. I encountered this page while seeking resources to support a WikiProject. Many links were themselves historical, or should have been. I contemplated updating that section based on my recent experience but decided there were other better sources already. —¿philoserf? (talk) 08:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The benefit for me is that it helps me find things that I didn't know to search for. I often come to this page, pick a random letter, and scan the list; I almost always learn about something that I didn't know was a thing. It's also helpful for finding a specific page about a subject that has a lot of related pages, as the search box dropdown is so literal. Schazjmd (talk) 13:48, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 February 2022

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected project page at Wikipedia:Editor's index to Wikipedia. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

Nguyen ba quoc (talk) 07:35, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Đồng ý. Nguyen ba quoc (talk) 07:36, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cảm ơn. Nguyen ba quoc (talk) 07:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nguyen ba buoc Nguyen ba quoc (talk) 07:38, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]