Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuck Me I'm Famous
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 12:11, 28 January 2022 (Replaced obsolete font tags and reduced Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 12:11, 28 January 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Replaced obsolete font tags and reduced Lint errors. (Task 12))
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. no arguments for deletion - MINUS the nom JForget 01:15, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Fuck Me I'm Famous (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't understand on what basis this album passed WP:NALBUMS. It has not recieved independent coverage and has virtually no sources. The only context/information it provides is an indescriminate list of track listings which could be found from a retailer. There is no encyclopedic information here and if anything it could be a copyright violation of the only source Davidguetta.com Lil-unique1 (talk) 22:35, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: a check of Hung Medien shows these albums appeared on Belgian, Austrian and Swiss albums charts [1][2][3][4][5]. And these albums respectively peaked at #4, #4, #31 and #1 on the French compilations chart, as shown on Infodisc database (see "David GUETTA") [6]. --Europe22 (talk) 23:41, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- comment perhaps if those are added to the article it might help its situation though still i dont see why such information couldn't simply be placed on guetta's discography. A page to provide a track listing and chart positions is not required or notable. Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:44, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and improve. The series comes from Guetta's parties/club nights of the same name and these should also be covered here. See, for example, [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13].--Michig (talk) 07:42, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Yes, it can definitely be improved but these albums have charted and were put together by a notable artist. At least they're all on one page rather than an individual page for each album. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 04:25, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.