Template talk:SPI case status/core

Request

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

|ENDORSED =<span style="background-color:#ADD8E6;border:darkgrey solid 1px;padding:4px">[[File:Symbol support2 vote.svg|20px]] – An [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Clerks|SPI clerk]] has '''endorsed''' a request for [[Wikipedia:CheckUser|CheckUser]]. A CheckUser will shortly review the case.</span>{{#if:{{{nocat|}}}||<includeonly>{{wikipedia other|[[Category:SPI cases awaiting a CheckUser|{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}|1|2}}]][[Category:SPI cases waiting for a CheckUser|{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}|1|2}}]]}}</includeonly>}}

Category:SPI cases awaiting a CheckUser and Category:SPI cases waiting for a CheckUser appear to be redundant. One of them should be removed from this template and deleted. —Guan aco 06:25, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging DeltaQuad for some insight as DQ has been active on this template and was the creator of the forked category. Cabayi (talk) 09:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they may be redundant, and they could be merged eventually, but right now bots are dependent on both categories. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 18:49, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done:. Thanks for the input DeltaQuad. Guanaco SPI is a specialist area where templates have meanings which aren't immediately apparent, and where bots do a fair chunk of the drudgery. Trust me, I got slapped down a few weeks ago for using a template which, despite a lack of warning, was meant for the use of clerks only. I'd let the SPI clerks & specialist admins look after the templates & categories in this area if I were you. Cabayi (talk) 19:05, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 17 March 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change the line

|COMPLETED =<span style="background-color:#d0f0c0;border:darkgrey solid 1px;padding:4px">[[File:Symbol redirect vote.svg|20px]] – A [[Wikipedia:CheckUser|CheckUser]] '''completed''' a check on

to

|COMPLETED =<span style="background-color:#d0f0c0;border:darkgrey solid 1px;padding:4px">[[File:Symbol redirect vote.svg|20px]] – A [[Wikipedia:CheckUser|CheckUser]] has '''completed''' a check on

(add "has" before completed). This would then match the other statuses, which all have forms of "to be" before the operative verb in the status (except for moreinfo, but that sentence has a different structure from the rest). Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 21:44, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Amanda (aka DQ) 23:52, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 13 January 2022

It is requested that an edit be made to the template-protected template at Template:SPI case status/core.
(edit · history · last · links · sandbox · edit sandbox · sandbox history · sandbox last edit · sandbox diff · transclusion count · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, so that an editor unfamiliar with the subject matter could complete the requested edit immediately.

Edit requests to template-protected pages should only be used for edits that are either uncontroversial or supported by consensus. If the proposed edit might be controversial, discuss it on the protected page's talk page before using this template. Consider making changes first to the template's sandbox before submitting an edit request. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request. When the request has been completed or denied, please add the |answered=yes parameter to deactivate the template.

Please sync this template with Template:SPI case status/core/sandbox. The sandbox changes update the colors to ensure all status colors meet at least WCAG AA Normal, which per MOS:COLOR is the minimum text should have against the background. The new colors can be viewed on Template:SPI case status/core/sandbox/doc, and a full comparison can be viewed at [1]. Per request: @Tamzin:. -- Asartea ^Talk ^| ^Contribs 16:11, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've created Template:SPI case status/testcases to show the differences. @Asartea: The one thing that occurs me is that (CU)MOREINFO and ADMINISTRATOR are meant to be fairly eye-catching, and your proposed changes make them significantly less so. Is there any way to preserve the flashiness while still hitting AA Normal? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 23:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just noting that I've seen this; I'll probably play around with it over the weekend, although in general flashy and accessible aren't easy to achieve at the same time. -- Asartea ^Talk ^| ^Contribs 16:54, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Asartea, Tamzin - I was curious and played about with this, as far as I can tell, the current colours for "more info" and "admin needed" meet WCAG AA, unless there's a specific font-size-dependent test I'm missing? firefly ( t · c ) 17:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore me, I am an idiot - helps if you test the link colour too....... firefly ( t · c ) 17:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]