Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fibonacci number program (2 nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DMacks (talk | contribs) at 21:15, 7 February 2007 (rvv). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 21:15, 7 February 2007 by DMacks (talk | contribs) (rvv)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete now that it's transwikied. ~ trialsanderrors 06:24, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
2nd nom. First nom in March. Highly unencyclopedic - a how to manual. Lack of any verification of notability. At first AfD consensus was hard to reach because of the multiple things nominated. - crz crztalk 02:15, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteTranswiki. Note that all other articles in the first nomination have since beendeletedtranswikied. -Amarkov blahedits 02:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Transwiki. riana_dzasta 02:55, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki - yes more of a how-to, but its introduction to the topic (vs all teh examples that follow) is encyclopaedic of an important step in learning about recursive programing and limitations on algorithm calculation. Not specified above what teh other articles were, but I presume transfered to wikibooks ? So whilst virtually all of the examples should move, should teh intro remain (with link to the wikibooks article of examples ?) David Ruben Talk 03:04, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki. Add a sentence or two, or even a section, to Fibonacci number about the ability to solve it linearly or recursively. Otherwise that material could be moved to Recursion or somesuch? It's relevant to "fibonacci" or to "explaining recursive", seems like a whole page just for "using fibonacci to explain recursive" is excessive. DMacks 03:13, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki per above. --Fred McGarry 03:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki per above. So tagged. MER-C 05:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wikibooks where how-to's belong and leave a link in the programming section of the Fibonacci sequence. - Mgm|(talk) 11:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki, this is much more of a manual than an encyclopedia article.-- danntm T C 18:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki per all of the above. Sharkface217 05:06, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki per above reasons. --Ixfd64 08:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki per above The Fox Man of Fire 20:14, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Now transwikied (b:Transwiki:Fibonacci number program), as per requested on b:WB:RFI. --SB_Johnny|talk|books 15:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.