Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet Download Accelerator
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Internet Download Accelerator (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
My prod was removed, but it seems like no significant coverage was added. I'm not sure if the Softpedia review counts as reliable, but it might be. The other reference is a trivial mention in a list. SL93 (talk) 02:46, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 02:46, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 03:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:03, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, no coverage other than listicles. Swordman97 talk to me 22:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I don't think Softpedia is reliable, or at least not without other sourcing. Listicle is not enough either. More would be needed and I too am unable to find more. Star Mississippi 15:34, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage in reliable sources. LibStar (talk) 00:07, 16 December 2021 (UTC)