Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm Alive and on Fire

I'm Alive and on Fire

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

I'm Alive and on Fire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable poorly sourced album. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

• Keep Has an Allmusic rating/review. Donaldd23 (talk) 12:08, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

• Reply - Per WP:NALBUM, "a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography". --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:38, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

:** I agree with Jax 0677. Ashleyyoursmile! 08:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

• Keep. The Allmusic review is not trivial, and there are more reviews out there like [1], [2]. Geschichte (talk) 14:04, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
• Keep - passes WP:NALBUMS. Reviews in multiple publications demonstrates significant coverage and clearly indicates that the album is notable for a standalone article. --Ashleyyoursmile! 14:32, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
• Reply - Per WP:NALBUM, "a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography".

Plenty of reviews to use to expand the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:09, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

• Reply - Be Bold! --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:30, 26 June 2021 (UTC)