Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm Alive and on Fire

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jax 0677 (talk | contribs) at 00:54, 24 June 2021 (r). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
I'm Alive and on Fire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable poorly sourced album. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply - Per WP:NALBUM, "a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography". --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:38, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

:** I agree with Jax 0677. Ashleyyoursmile! 08:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The Allmusic review is not trivial, and there are more reviews out there like [1], [2]. Geschichte (talk) 14:04, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - passes WP:NALBUMS. Reviews in multiple publications demonstrates significant coverage and clearly indicates that the album is notable for a standalone article. --Ashleyyoursmile! 14:32, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply - Per WP:NALBUM, "a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography".