Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TinyMVC Framework
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 10:09, 14 June 2021 (Fixed old behaviour of link-wrapping font tags in a signature (Task 1)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 10:09, 14 June 2021 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed old behaviour of link-wrapping font tags in a signature (Task 1))
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 23:42, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- TinyMVC Framework (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another PHP framework article without any reference. I don't think it has enough notability. –ebraminiotalk 12:42, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:40, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I found no sources to argue for subject's notability. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 21:22, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 19:01, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Lack of reliable sources causes a seeming fail of WP:NSOFT and WP:GNG. Nature of the software makes meeting the significance requirements of WP:NSOFT unlikely. -- BenTels (talk) 00:36, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.