Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SLOOP Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Due to lack of participation (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:49, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SLOOP Project

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find independent coverage to indicate this former initiative was notable. The only independent journal article isn't well cited, and the others are folks involved with the project. I would not be against a merge, but I cannot identify the ideal target. (That the article has been a mess is not my concern, I'd be happy to clean it up if I could find sourcing with which to do so). Survived PROD shortly after creation StarM 14:30, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. StarM 14:30, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. StarM 14:30, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Run n Fly (talk) 15:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There are some good sources like this one: ISBN 978-1-59904-987-8, "Online Science Learning: Best Practices and Technologies", page 124. The references currently present in the article are completely wrong. Some of them don't even mention the subject. Others mention a specific person instead. Dr.KBAHT (talk) 16:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheChronium 17:21, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.