Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SLOOP Project

SLOOP Project

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find independent coverage to indicate this former initiative was notable. The only independent journal article isn't well cited, and the others are folks involved with the project. I would not be against a merge, but I cannot identify the ideal target. (That the article has been a mess is not my concern, I'd be happy to clean it up if I could find sourcing with which to do so). Survived PROD shortly after creation StarM 14:30, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. StarM 14:30, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. StarM 14:30, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Run n Fly (talk) 15:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There are some good sources like this one: ISBN 978-1-59904-987-8, "Online Science Learning: Best Practices and Technologies", page 124. The references currently present in the article are completely wrong. Some of them don't even mention the subject. Others mention a specific person instead. Dr.KBAHT (talk) 16:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheChronium 17:21, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]