Jump to content

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems: Difference between revisions

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by Rodrigo.Argenton (talk) to last revision by Jcb
Tag: Rollback
Line 126: Line 126:
A pretty bad usage of the bad of the batch tool. Some volunteers shouldn't have the access to this tool... -- <small>[[User:Rodrigo.Argenton|Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton]]</small><sup>[[User talk:Rodrigo.Argenton| m]]</sup> 20:06, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
A pretty bad usage of the bad of the batch tool. Some volunteers shouldn't have the access to this tool... -- <small>[[User:Rodrigo.Argenton|Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton]]</small><sup>[[User talk:Rodrigo.Argenton| m]]</sup> 20:06, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
{{abot}}
{{abot}}

== Jcb abuse of sysop post. ==

{{u|Jcb}} is closing my requests here with no property, the volunteer created a massive problem that I reported [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&type=revision&diff=347623441&oldid=347545162], and he closed just because it's me.

It's not the first time, [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&type=revision&diff=345966614&oldid=345943927] at this month that he could my request nonsense, and did not solve the issue. He have personal issues with me, tried already to stop previous works, and now it's not only allowing threats on my talk page, he is also "warning" me after his abuses. [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ARodrigo.Argenton&type=revision&diff=347626499&oldid=347593498].

-- <small>[[User:Rodrigo.Argenton|Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton]]</small><sup>[[User talk:Rodrigo.Argenton| m]]</sup> 20:49, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:51, 28 April 2019

Shortcuts: COM:AN/U • COM:ANU

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergency@wikimedia.org.

Vandalism
[new section]
User problems
[new section]
Blocks and protections
[new section]
Other
[new section]

Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.


Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.


Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.


Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.

Archives
25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
123, 122, 121, 120, 119, 118, 117, 116, 115, 114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

Note

  • Keep your report as short as possible, but include links as evidence.
  • Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
  • It is usually appropriate to notify the user(s) concerned. {{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN/U|thread=|reason=}} is available for this.
  • It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; Please try to remain civil with your comments.
  • Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.

Hedidthistome

Hedidthistome (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Alias Hitherexyz, alias Emma Stones. Same bad Flickr account used recently by Hitherexyz, same subject (Constance Wu). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:24, 19 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done Indefinitely blocked by Herbythyme. Uploads deleted. Taivo (talk) 06:15, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ulises Márquez Catamarca

Ulises Márquez Catamarca (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Recreated deleted content (logos) despite block. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:36, 19 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done. Blocked by Herbythyme until end of May. Taivo (talk) 06:17, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Websteralive

I blocked Websteralive (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) for this edit. Impersonation while voting is not acceptable. This is obviously not a new user, but most probably a sock of Websterdead (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information), indef. blocked. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:02, 21 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Agree with indef block. Several consecutive FPC noms all containing sexual imagery or graphics depiction of sexual acts, with more listed on their userpage for subsequent intended noms. This indicates a user who is here simply to offend and provoke. The comments made in those nominations also indicate a "trouble-making" mentality. Does indeed appear to be a sock. -- Colin (talk) 08:58, 21 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Jaheen3alam

Jaheen3alam (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Continues copyvios out of block. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:24, 21 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done Third block. Indef'ed. --Majora (talk) 21:43, 21 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ttezaki

Uploading multiple copyright violations since 2016. Could someone delete the files and warn/block the user? Thanks, 153.229.39.184 03:20, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi, You need to inform a user when you tag a file. Thanks, Yann (talk) 03:36, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
✓ Done Warned, files deleted. Yann (talk) 03:36, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
You also need to inform a user when you report them here.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 03:40, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Chinese copyvio

@BevinKacon: this is a clear-cut “upload copyvio after warnings” condition, that is, B&P noticeboard. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:50, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done Uploads nuked, both accounts indefinitely blocked. --jdx Re: 11:03, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

User talk:Tokota

  • several warnins to stop uploading copyvios
  • block for 1 week because of still going on with this by Sebari in June 2018
  • block for 1 month because of still carry on by Taivo in July 2018
  • after many deletions of logos uploaded by him he continued uploading protected logos with wrong declaration, such as File:Coleman-logo.png or File:Logo-sudameris.png
  • new warning by Yann today - Tokota's reaction: "You are wrong."
  • in defiance of telling him that the pic is not OK for commonsn here he uploaded it anyway
  • message on his talk page for this today uploaded pic without permission - Tokota's reaction: "This is nonsense."

What else is necessary to block him infinite? --Stepro (talk) 16:49, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Stepro: Nothing, but the word we use here is "indefinitely".   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:52, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I can’t see the whole picture. From the user_talk, the user uploaded several out-of-scope pictures and duplicates (which are by now all deleted) and has seemingly somewhat poor understanding of copyright. But Tokota isn’t a typical forger and liar whom we hunt daily. I mean the ilk of liars uploading Internet copyvio as own works. IMHO indefinite block is overly harsh in these circumstances. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:24, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I was just wondering when you would show up, to spread your usual nonsense... Yann (talk) 19:58, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • Just wow. Regardless of context, it’s apparently acceptable for an admin to calmly dismiss another user’s concerns using words such as «your usual nonsense» — and this from one of the “acceptable” admins, not from one of the several who are permanently on the verge of being desysopped and yet never are because of reasons. This only raises my admiration for the few admins who manage not to behave like this (some of them contributing on this very page), but that’s scarce consolation and really not firm ground to tread on, let alone build anything of worth. -- Tuválkin 07:25, 23 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
This is third block. No improvement in behavior. I'll delete speedily some obvious copyvios with wrong license. Taivo (talk) 06:18, 23 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Bioexalhum

Bioexalhum (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Everything is copyvio. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:29, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Uploads deleted. Final warning given. Next time a block will be issued. --Majora (talk) 21:42, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

User:Hoang42006 (II)

The user was already blocked for a week in March, but continues to upload several obvious copyvios. I appreciate that there may be a language barrier, maybe a Vietnamese (?) speaking user could try a more detailed and clearer explanation for this user. The user seems to try in good faith, but the excessive amount of problems should be handled somehow. Most glaring problems leading to copyvios: doesn't understand copyright of derivative copyrighted works and doesn't provide truthful source and author information. GermanJoe (talk) 13:02, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done Second block, 3 months. Yann (talk) 13:36, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
 Info Changed to indef: all what the user uploaded by now seems to be either already deleted, or about to be deleted. This really isn't going to get anything useful. en:WP:COMPETENCE etc., you know... --A.Savin 15:55, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please undo a Category move

Hi. Can someone please undo THIS MOVE? It is not what I intended, and I really created a mess with that move. Thank you. (Please be sure that, after your undo, I will be able to manually create the Cat "Puerto Rico primary highway shields", the Cat that I did the move to. If this doesn't make sense, respond here or email me. thx.) Mercy11 (talk) 21:02, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

@~riley: My bad. Thanks a zillion! Mercy11 (talk) 11:10, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Lopezmarianap

Everything is copyvio. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:37, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done Deleted and blocked. --Majora (talk) 01:08, 28 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Abuse of noticeboard. Jcb (talk) 20:37, 28 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Elisfkc massive edit

Elisfkc (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log

Revert the massive edits that Elisfkc recently performed. They didn't read the documentation Commons:500px licensing data, and performed a batch task including an unnecessary {{Licensereview}} template in, I don't know how many, files that the 500 px tool was used to upload. The 500px tool verifies the license, as we already extensively explained already.

A pretty bad usage of the bad of the batch tool. Some volunteers shouldn't have the access to this tool... -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 20:06, 28 April 2019 (UTC)Reply


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.