Talk:Misuse of p-values: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 20:0020:00, 10 January 2025 Lowercase sigmabot III talk contribs m 15,999 bytes −128,219 Archiving 21 discussion(s) to Talk:Misuse of p-values/Archive 1, Talk:Misuse of p-values/Archive 2) (bot undo
curprev 06:2106:21, 10 January 2025 Wizmut talk contribs 144,218 bytes +221 add archive bot undo

curprev 17:3517:35, 21 April 2024 Utopes talk contribs 143,997 bytes +835 Notification: listing of P-hunting at WP:Redirects for discussion. undo Tag: Twinkle

curprev 13:2013:20, 8 February 2024 Qwerfjkl (bot) talk contribs 143,162 bytes −7 Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26) undo Tag: Talk banner shell conversion

curprev 09:0809:08, 22 September 2021 GreenC bot talk contribs 143,169 bytes +18 Add {{reflist-talk}} to #Opposite sides of 0.05 (via reftalk bot) undo

curprev 19:2819:28, 12 March 2021 Nuretok talk contribs 143,151 bytes +202 →Opposite sides of 0.05 undo
curprev 10:1610:16, 12 March 2021 23.242.198.189 talk 142,949 bytes +1,713 →Opposite sides of 0.05: that misconception is already addressed in the article without the problematic and subjective language about "statistical conflict" undo

curprev 14:2414:24, 3 March 2021 Nuretok talk contribs 141,236 bytes +1,243 →Opposite sides of 0.05: new section undo

curprev 18:5218:52, 4 December 2019 130.182.24.154 talk 139,993 bytes +349 →No link back to the p-value article: there IS a link to the p-value article undo

curprev 16:2116:21, 2 December 2019 Mgnbar talk contribs 139,644 bytes +134 →No link back to the p-value article: there is one undo
curprev 16:0216:02, 2 December 2019 SineBot talk contribs m 139,510 bytes +285 Signing comment by 194.5.225.252 - "→No link back to the p-value article: new section" undo
curprev 16:0116:01, 2 December 2019 194.5.225.252 talk 139,225 bytes +79 →No link back to the p-value article: new section undo

curprev 04:4804:48, 8 September 2019 SineBot talk contribs m 139,146 bytes +289 Signing comment by 23.242.198.189 - "→P-value Fallacy Section Should Be Removed: time for the section to go" undo
curprev 04:4704:47, 8 September 2019 23.242.198.189 talk 138,857 bytes +5,446 →P-value Fallacy Section Should Be Removed: time for the section to go undo

curprev 05:2805:28, 13 June 2019 Wikiman2718 talk contribs m 133,411 bytes 0 Wikiman2718 moved page Talk:Misunderstandings of p-values to Talk:Misuse of p-values: More encyclopedic: Encyclopedias do not exist to correct misunderstanding, but to document fact, such as that p-values are often misused. undo

curprev 23:2623:26, 19 October 2018 Ponyo talk contribs m 133,411 bytes −8 rvv undo Tag: Rollback
curprev 23:1923:19, 19 October 2018 2600:100d:b117:e3e1:cc2e:5760:65f2:3f84 talk 133,419 bytes +8 →P-value Fallacy Section Should Be Removed undo

curprev 07:2207:22, 16 October 2018 23.242.198.189 talk 133,411 bytes +275 →P-value Fallacy Section Should Be Removed undo

curprev 01:3501:35, 12 October 2018 Headbomb talk contribs 133,136 bytes +277 →P-value Fallacy Section Should Be Removed: :The section belongs here. See refs in the section. ~~~~ undo
curprev 01:2401:24, 12 October 2018 23.242.198.189 talk 132,859 bytes +280 →P-value Fallacy Section Should Be Removed: edit request undo

curprev 00:0400:04, 29 September 2018 164.67.15.175 talk 132,579 bytes +643 →P-value Fallacy Section Should Be Removed undo

curprev 07:1607:16, 27 September 2018 Chalst talk contribs 131,936 bytes +358 →P-value Fallacy Section Should Be Removed: r undo

curprev 02:0202:02, 26 September 2018 23.242.198.189 talk 131,578 bytes +48 →P-value Fallacy Section Should Be Removed undo
curprev 01:5701:57, 26 September 2018 23.242.198.189 talk 131,530 bytes +1,031 →P-value Fallacy Section Should Be Removed undo

curprev 08:4508:45, 25 September 2018 Chalst talk contribs 130,499 bytes +317 →P-value Fallacy Section Should Be Removed: argue against undo

curprev 21:1221:12, 24 September 2018 164.67.15.175 talk 130,182 bytes +1,022 →P-value Fallacy Section Should Be Removed: new section undo

curprev 04:1104:11, 5 September 2018 Gulumeemee talk contribs 129,160 bytes +179 →Semi-protected edit request on 4 September 2018: Done undo

curprev 23:1123:11, 4 September 2018 Amoriarty21 talk contribs 128,981 bytes +576 →Semi-protected edit request on 4 September 2018: new section undo

curprev 01:4401:44, 31 July 2016 Sunrise talk contribs 128,405 bytes +400 →"p-values do not account for the effects of confounding and bias" (in the list of misunderstandings): cmt undo

curprev 07:4907:49, 23 July 2016 Bondegezou talk contribs 128,005 bytes +482 →"p-values do not account for the effects of confounding and bias" (in the list of misunderstandings) undo
curprev 02:0702:07, 23 July 2016 23.242.207.48 talk 127,523 bytes +1,063 →"p-values do not account for the effects of confounding and bias" (in the list of misunderstandings): new section undo

curprev 12:3012:30, 21 July 2016 SineBot talk contribs m 126,460 bytes +353 Signing comment by 2607:FEA8:CC60:1FA:9863:1984:B360:4013 - "→xkcd comic was a good example!: new section" undo
curprev 12:3012:30, 21 July 2016 2607:fea8:cc60:1fa:9863:1984:b360:4013 talk 126,107 bytes +1,045 →xkcd comic was a good example!: new section undo
curprev 12:2412:24, 21 July 2016 Bondegezou talk contribs 125,062 bytes +187 →Should the paragraph about the jellybean comic strip be removed? (in the multiple comparisons section) undo
curprev 00:5400:54, 21 July 2016 Sunrise talk contribs 124,875 bytes +393 →What should we do with the list?: cmt undo

curprev 12:4612:46, 19 July 2016 Ozob talk contribs 124,482 bytes +292 →What should we do with the list? undo
curprev 03:4603:46, 19 July 2016 Headbomb talk contribs 124,190 bytes +404 →What should we do with the list?: ::::Then the header should be updated, because it says these are common misconceptions. I'd much prefer rephrasing in terms of what the misconceptions are, however. ~~~~ undo
curprev 03:0203:02, 19 July 2016 Ozob talk contribs 123,786 bytes +469 →What should we do with the list? undo
curprev 02:0302:03, 19 July 2016 Headbomb talk contribs 123,317 bytes +782 →What should we do with the list?: ::"'''In the absence of other evidence, the information provided by a p-value is limited.''' A p-value near 0.05 is usually weak evidence.[1][2]"" What? In the absence of other evidence, the information provided by undo

curprev 23:3423:34, 18 July 2016 Ozob talk contribs 122,535 bytes +131 →What should we do with the list? undo

curprev 13:2613:26, 17 July 2016 Headbomb talk contribs 122,404 bytes −5 →What should we do with the list?: whitespace so # shows properly undo
curprev 08:1208:12, 17 July 2016 Sunrise talk contribs 122,409 bytes +4,142 →What should we do with the list?: proposal undo

curprev 06:4006:40, 15 July 2016 Sunrise talk contribs 118,267 bytes +1,080 →What should we do with the list?: cmt undo

10 January 2025

21 April 2024

8 February 2024

22 September 2021

12 March 2021

3 March 2021

4 December 2019

2 December 2019

8 September 2019

13 June 2019

19 October 2018

16 October 2018

12 October 2018

29 September 2018

27 September 2018

26 September 2018

25 September 2018

24 September 2018

5 September 2018

4 September 2018

31 July 2016

23 July 2016

21 July 2016

19 July 2016

18 July 2016

17 July 2016

15 July 2016

14 July 2016