Jump to content

Talk:Data structure alignment: Revision history

View logs for this page (view filter log)

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 14:3914:39, 1 November 2024 Kvng talk contribs 27,391 bytes +1 Assessment: banner shell, Computing (Low), Computer science (Rater) undo

curprev 14:4314:43, 28 January 2024 Qwerfjkl (bot) talk contribs 27,390 bytes +19 Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26) undo Tag: Talk banner shell conversion

curprev 08:3208:32, 29 October 2023 Jay talk contribs 27,371 bytes +7 moved 1-level section topics to 2-level undo

curprev 20:2320:23, 21 July 2023 Jay talk contribs 27,364 bytes +814 "Padding (computing)" listed at Redirects for discussion undo

curprev 14:0214:02, 13 December 2020 SineBot talk contribs m 26,550 bytes +312 Signing comment by Abd.nh - "→Mention C11's _Alignas: new section" undo
curprev 14:0014:00, 13 December 2020 Abd.nh talk contribs 26,238 bytes +191 →Mention C11's _Alignas: new section undo

curprev 22:1722:17, 11 November 2020 Guy Harris talk contribs 26,047 bytes +101 →Half vs 3/4: Fixed. undo
curprev 21:4821:48, 11 November 2020 SineBot talk contribs m 25,946 bytes +286 Signing comment by 88.130.51.182 - "→Half vs 3/4: new section" undo
curprev 21:4721:47, 11 November 2020 88.130.51.182 talk 25,660 bytes +471 →Half vs 3/4: new section undo

curprev 18:5218:52, 20 January 2020 Guy Harris talk contribs 25,189 bytes +264 →On a 32-bit architecture, would a 16-bit value not aligned on a 32-bit boundary be accessed more slowly?: I went with an example that works even if it wouldn't be. undo

curprev 17:1117:11, 10 September 2019 Guy Harris talk contribs 24,925 bytes +1,207 →On a 32-bit architecture, would a 16-bit value not aligned on a 32-bit boundary be accessed more slowly?: Why pick an example that doesn't apply to byte-addressable machines, rather than one that applies to word-addressable *and* byte-addressable machines? undo
curprev 14:4214:42, 10 September 2019 Maury Markowitz talk contribs 23,718 bytes +80 →On a 32-bit architecture, would a 16-bit value not aligned on a 32-bit boundary be accessed more slowly? undo
curprev 13:5113:51, 10 September 2019 Maury Markowitz talk contribs 23,638 bytes +370 →On a 32-bit architecture, would a 16-bit value not aligned on a 32-bit boundary be accessed more slowly? undo

curprev 18:5218:52, 5 September 2019 Guy Harris talk contribs 20,575 bytes +1,345 →On a 32-bit architecture, would a 16-bit value not aligned on a 32-bit boundary be accessed more slowly?: new section undo

curprev 17:5917:59, 5 October 2017 Guy Harris talk contribs 19,230 bytes +866 →Multiple-of-6 and multiple-of-8 word lengths a consequence of character sizes?: new section undo

curprev 08:1508:15, 23 March 2016 SineBot talk contribs m 18,364 bytes +337 Signing comment by Bumblebritches57 - "→The article is too vague to be very useful: new section" undo
curprev 08:1508:15, 23 March 2016 Bumblebritches57 talk contribs 18,027 bytes +300 →The article is too vague to be very useful: new section undo

curprev 08:3308:33, 16 September 2012 Kephir talk contribs 17,727 bytes +16 hdr undo
curprev 00:5800:58, 16 September 2012 Dsalt talk contribs 17,711 bytes +690 →ARM: new section undo

curprev 13:0913:09, 22 November 2011 Clc38 talk contribs 17,021 bytes +1,098 →Packing vs endianness: new section undo

curprev 22:5022:50, 18 June 2011 Kerfuffle090 talk contribs 15,923 bytes −220 →agreed and made the change undo
curprev 22:4322:43, 18 June 2011 SineBot talk contribs m 16,143 bytes +315 Signing comment by Kerfuffle090 - "→agreed and made the change: " undo
curprev 22:4122:41, 18 June 2011 Kerfuffle090 talk contribs 15,828 bytes +521 →agreed and made the change undo

curprev 22:4222:42, 21 February 2011 Cppljevans talk contribs 15,307 bytes +236 →calculation of whole structure alignment and size and all member paddings undo
curprev 22:2622:26, 21 February 2011 Cppljevans talk contribs 15,071 bytes 0 →least common multiple requires at least 2 args undo
curprev 22:2422:24, 21 February 2011 Cppljevans talk contribs 15,071 bytes +256 →least common multiple requires at least 2 args undo
curprev 22:0822:08, 21 February 2011 Cppljevans talk contribs 14,815 bytes +318 →least common multiple requires at least 2 args undo

curprev 18:2618:26, 18 February 2011 Cppljevans talk contribs 14,497 bytes +411 →calculation of whole structure alignment and size and all member paddings undo
curprev 17:3017:30, 18 February 2011 Cppljevans talk contribs 14,086 bytes +786 →least common multiple requires at least 2 args undo
curprev 02:4602:46, 18 February 2011 Cppljevans talk contribs 13,300 bytes +113 →calculation of whole structure alignment and size and all member paddings undo
curprev 02:4102:41, 18 February 2011 Cppljevans talk contribs 13,187 bytes +8 →calculation of whole structure alignment and paddings undo

curprev 16:1516:15, 4 October 2010 SineBot talk contribs m 5,278 bytes +305 Signing comment by 195.146.153.234 - "→Default packing and #pragma pack: new section" undo
curprev 16:1416:14, 4 October 2010 195.146.153.234 talk 4,973 bytes +359 →Default packing and #pragma pack: new section undo

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Data_structure_alignment"