Jump to content

Computerized classification test: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

24 March 2025

18 January 2025

17 January 2025

16 January 2025

15 January 2025

22 October 2023

  • curprev 15:0015:00, 22 October 2023 2a02:c7c:a87d:ed00:290d:18f6:79ad:86f6 talk 16,273 bytes −792 Deleted inexplicable link working undo
  • curprev 11:5811:58, 22 October 2023 212.70.117.194 talk 17,065 bytes +816 Performance Appraisal System Errors 1. Halo effect: This is when a strengths in one area of performance lead to a positive appraisal of the employee in all areas of performance without properly evaluating them separately. 2. Recency effect: This is when an employee's most recent performance is given more weight in the appraisal than their overall performance throughout the year. 3. Leniency or strictness bias: These are errors in which the manager either rates all employees too highly or too low undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

14 August 2023

1 June 2023

14 January 2022

13 January 2022

15 November 2021

11 August 2017

29 November 2016

23 October 2016

11 July 2015

15 September 2014

19 January 2014

12 October 2012

7 June 2011

29 October 2010

23 March 2010

30 November 2009

14 September 2009

23 January 2009

25 December 2008

2 September 2008

24 March 2008

4 October 2007

3 October 2007

20 September 2007

23 March 2007

9 February 2007

5 February 2007

19 December 2006

18 December 2006

13 December 2006

12 December 2006

8 December 2006

1 December 2006

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)