User:Rmhermen

![]() | This user has been editing Wikipedia for more than ten years. |
Admin
[edit]I am a Wikipedia:administrator since July 5, 2004. I first contributed to Wikipedia in April of 2001 (oldest edits lost in early software upgrades). My first edit with my username appears to be on April 26. I have been active on a number of online projects - active and passive (SETI@Home, Distributed Proofreaders, Mars crater labeling, Stardust@Home, Folding@Home on the Wikipedia team: Team page, etc.)
Action | Count |
---|---|
Edits | 61561 |
Edits+Deleted | 64928 |
Pages deleted | 3958 |
Revisions deleted | 14 |
Pages restored | 30 |
Pages protected | 80 |
Pages unprotected | 9 |
Protections modified | 23 |
Users blocked | 101 |
Users reblocked | 1 |
User rights modified | 1 |
Administrative backlog
[edit]
Reports
[edit]- 173.197.211.18 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 46 five times in the last 5 minutes ("Poop" vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:42, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- ArdynOfTheAncients (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1311 (LTA 1311, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:26, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- 2601:804:8700:26f8:536:397e:43c6:4c4e (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 21:06, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- 73.137.161.198 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 984 (AIV / Noticeboard disruption 2, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 21:41, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- ShermanDuArthur (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Persistent removal of character and episode descriptions from Katie and Orbie and List of Katie and Orbie episodes for several years. 2600:387:15:181A:0:0:0:5 (talk) 21:54, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- TuffnutsWife (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) User has been warned repeatedly about making disruptive edits to the How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World article, yet still continues to do so. Please ban them.
User-reported
[edit]- Colly Industries (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Seems like a company name. I can't say whether the edits they've made break any rules. Gommeh ➡️ Talk to me 15:48, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- They've made one edit which isn't promotional. I'd wait until they make promotional edits. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 03:09, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
- Chasing Dreams in the Philippines (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See userpage. jlwoodwa (talk) 18:05, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- It's just their name + Llc, no other edits? Secretlondon (talk) 18:17, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
![]() | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
- BET Awards (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- BET Awards 2025 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and unsorced disruptive editing on both articles, particularly with likely fake special awards featuring Chris Brown and Tyga from IPs. Kaptain Yummy (talk) 02:30, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Less than seven hours after the previous protection of this page expired, the vandalism that this article has proven to consistently attract for seven months now returned. This is now my fifth time requesting protection on this page (1, 2, 3, 4). Each time, the page was temporarily protected, with the most recent one resulting in three months of semi, and IPs have also been blocked. Yet the vandalism continues to return from completely different IP ranges almost instantly after the page protection ends. While the vandalism since the protection was lifted hasn't proven to be egregious or repetitive quite yet, I believe the precedent that it's already happened twice in the span of a few hours, after seven months since this began and three months of protection, is clear. λ NegativeMP1 07:47, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Too many premature edits. A short-term protection may be required. Wikipediæ philosophia (talk) 10:15, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- +1 I think a short semi-protection would be a better fit given the recent edit frequency. Entranced98 (talk) 13:13, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 11:28, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Also some disruptive editing going on since April.Woxic1589 (talk) 11:36, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent page blanking. Karst (talk) 11:53, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Skitash (talk) 12:12, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing copyvio from various IPs (material being added is direct copy of source being added). Nat Gertler (talk) 12:45, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Immediately vandalised again after the previous protection expired Snowflake91 (talk) 15:29, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Immediately vandalised again after the previous protection expired Snowflake91 (talk) 15:30, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of repeated IP vandalism about which someone purporting to be the subject has complained, not unreasonably. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:55, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This is a test page. Users created it twice, leading to it being deleted. This page should be fully protected from creation to prevent users from creating this article, just like Red link example. You can see two deletions listed on the page for the same reason. Mario662629 (talk) 16:18, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Declined Two deletions six and thirteen years ago, respectively. Nothing at all recently. No pressing need for protection of any sort. BusterD (talk) 18:05, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense ‥ 论 16:26, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – this was protected for 10 days, and then that IP has now reappeared once that expired. (an there's an edit that I don't want to revert due to 3RR but needs attention). ZimZalaBim talk 17:58, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
User(s) partially blocked' (from Sara James'). — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:11, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Extension (Doesn't need to be indefinite, but still high risk of vandalism). Valorrr (lets chat) 18:49, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. See very low rate of vandalism currently. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:06, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP user keeps removing content without a valid reason. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 19:16, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 19:22, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection. High level of IP vandalism. This is one of the articles that needs indefinite semi-protection. It will always be a target. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 19:55, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected until 21 January 2029, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will be logged under WP:CT/AP. Favonian (talk) 20:10, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli conflict. Laura240406 (talk) 20:02, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent deletion of important, sourced information by an anon editor on a dynamic IP. (My guess is that somebody would love their property to have a more prestigious address than it does!) Joe D (t) 20:18, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism recently. 3X attempts from different IP's, all reverted but seems coordinated. MaximusEditor (talk) 20:41, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Recurring IP vandal Fieryninja (talk) 22:09, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Removal of pending changes protection: The article is now under indefinite semi-protection, so pending changes protection is redundant. BriDash9000 (talk) 17:10, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Removal of pending changes protection: Just like Newcastle United F.C., the article is now under indefinite semi-protection, so pending changes protection is reduntant. BriDash9000 (talk) 17:20, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Removal of pending changes protection: Same reason with Newcastle United F.C. and Economy of Bangladesh. BriDash9000 (talk) 17:45, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Political parties should be able to have their own pages in my opinion for the good of public awareness, especially in this case where the party is a part of a pan European party, Volt Europa, the individual chapters are even more important due to their goals of creating a European parliament group, which requires representation in multiple countries. Xanix1000 (talk) 19:54, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Note: I declined to unprotect when asked here. Ponyobons mots 20:19, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Ponyo's decision stands. The only way forward is to create Draft:Volt Ireland and get it approved through the WP:AFC process. Favonian (talk) 20:36, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
3 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:00, 14 May 2025 (UTC) |
10 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 17:20, 14 May 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
New page reviewer who has made over 90 articles including 1 good article and quite familiar with content guidelines, I may also as well not clutter the backlog for other reviewers. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I am autopatrolled and an NPP reviewer; I would actually like to nominate User:Kjansen86 to be autopatrolled. I just reviewed and cheerfully accepted almost a dozen perfectly-formulated articles on Zoroastrian texts, and they have made more than 25 overall. Looking at their talk page, this appears to be an experienced and effective editor. Checking their AfD stats, I find one (successful) AfD that they initiated, indicating an awareness of notability. We may as well take them out of the NPP backlog. (This is my first time nominating someone else so if I did it wrong, please let me know!) ~ L 🌸 (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
78 live articles, (64 of which is start class, 5 Cs, 8 Stubs). Only one was deleted which is from 2018. All of the articles are well-sourced. I think this user is good enough for Autopatrolled Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have created over 30 articles, none of which have been deleted. I am well-versed in Wikipedia's notability guidelines and currently assist new Burmese editors. I focus on creating articles related to Myanmar that need to be written, including those covering current events. Granting me autopatrolled rights would help reduce the backlog of articles awaiting review. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Thank you for your consideration. Hteiktinhein (talk) 14:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello Admin! I have been regularly creating articles and I'm also familiar with WP:AUTOPAT and Wikipedia policies. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 15:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Hallo! I've created 46 articles, and have been editing Wikipedia since 2010. How time flies! merlinVtwelve (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I have created 118 pages and would like to have autopatrol rights, please. Thanks. Phantomdj (talk) 01:46, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia for the past five years and have created over 150 articles. I strive to produce well-sourced, high-quality content on topics such as Bayan al-Quran, Mamunul Haque, and Deobandi fiqh, and I have also improved existing articles like the one on Zakariyya Kandhlawi. While I understand that the Autopatrolled user right is not necessary for editing, I have noticed that the page review process can be significantly delayed, with some of my pages taking 6–12 months to be reviewed. As a New Page Reviewer for the past two years, I actively participate in wiki forums, including AfD, and none of my articles have been deleted in the past three years, which I believe demonstrates my understanding of notability and other relevant guidelines. I believe I am eligible for the Autopatrolled right, which would help reduce the backlog of unreviewed pages. Additionally, I have held the Autopatrolled right on Bengali Wikipedia for the past five years. Thanks. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 04:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
This user has created a huge number of articles, mostly to do with football in Switzerland. A cursory review shows that the articles often need copyediting and could use more inline citations, but the subjects are consistently notable and the articles are generally well-researched and -referenced, so I don't see much for NPP to do here. Toadspike [Talk] 15:38, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Recommending Kimikel for autopatrolled. A little over the threshold with 27 articles created, but they are all clean, polished, notable, well-sourced -- and do not require the attention of patrollers. No deletions. Three GAs in the mix, which is where I first encountered this editor. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:41, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Requesting the AWB to perform repetitive tasks. I will mainly use it for adding categories to AFd debates, fixing grammatical error, fixing abuse of tags. Thanks for considering my request. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 07:33, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Not sure if right place to post this; I already had awb permissions under the username "seefooddiet", but my account was recently renamed to "grapesurgeon". My username needs to be updated in Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPageJSON to "grapesurgeon". grapesurgeon (formerly seefooddiet) (talk) 19:59, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
I would like to do repitative tasks such as adding wikilinks, fixing typos, etc Warriorglance(talk to me) 06:32, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi. I intend to use AWB to assist with repetitive but useful maintenance tasks such as fixing common formatting issues, updating templates, correcting typos, and performing category cleanups. Similarly, I have also reviewed the guidelines and will ensure all edits follow Wikipedia policies. I am also familiar with Wikipedia editing conventions and have made constructive edits. Thank you for considering my request and I hope for positive response. Fade258 (talk) 13:24, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for confirmation |
---|
Confirmed[edit]
Reason for requesting confirmed rights Nickeldeon Bransonphan239& (talk) 14:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for extended confirmation |
---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
I had my EC revoked last year by the arbitration committee. I have since completed the required 500 substantial edits to the best of my knowledge. I applied about a month ago and was refused because I didn't clearly understand the requirements. But hopefully this time I got it correctly. Tashmetu (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
---|
Event coordinator[edit] |
Requests for mass message sender |
---|
Mass message sender[edit]
I believe that I should have Mass Message Sender permissions as I am WP:X’s newsletter (Ichthus)’s chief editor, and I will be sending various newsletters to the people of WP:X, as I have already done. Having this permission will help me fulfill my duties. Thank you! Benedictions, FarmerUpbeat (talk) 11:50, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I'm requesting preliminary new page reviewer to help with the backlog drive. Preliminary because I'm not perfect—I've definitely fallen victim to WP:AKON before with my own creations[1], but I also have created a number of articles that stuck, and edited up articles quite a bit[2]. Importantly each process I've learned and grown. I plan to start small and grow over time as I become more and more confident with the process. Just recently attempted to review a draft with obvious advertising and realized the permissions would be good. Thanks, References Scaledish! Talkish? Statish. 03:36, 13 May 2025 (UTC) |
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page mover[edit]
There are some categories that might warrant moving that I cannot currently without this permission. For tangentially related details, I have a 98.9% AfD match rate, have made 63,500+ edits, and have been editing for a couple years now and am familiar with the page move policy and guidelines. Iljhgtn (talk) 20:15, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
Hello. I would like to request this permission. I'm reviewing the Special:Recentchanges, & I often see articles protected by the pending changes protection. I've read the both necessary articles about this feature and am familiar with the most important policies, including WP:BLP, obviously. Besides, I got the rollback a couple of weeks ago, so I can use it if necessary. The Seal F1 (talk) 09:40, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to help reduce the pending changes backlog. Destinyokhiria (talk) 21:18, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Holla, It’s been over a month since I last requested for Pending changes right, I’m sure I meet the requirements now, I actively patrol the recent changes feed and I want to help. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 21:23, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
I have been editing Wikipedia for over 2 years and have made over 5,700 edits. I’ve also been reverting vandalism using twinkle for a while so I am familiar with the guidelines. SKAG123 (talk) 23:40, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello, my first request was not done a year ago, I am reapplying today. I have read the review guide. Sometimes I look at the pending changes but I cannot accept good edits. Leotalk 16:05, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello editors, I request permission to review pending changes to help out the community on pages needing the RPC verification; I want to verify good content on the platform and this is one part that I would really appreciate access to. I would be reviewing and approving edits per Wiki guidelines, and I have read all policies on vandalism, copyright, BLP, etc. thanks! 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 02:32, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I'm a long-time user on Wikipedia (have experience with rollback rights on my home Wiki and here), recently I'm actively using support tools to prevent cross-wiki vandalism (including enwiki). I'd like to be granted Pending changes reviewer rights on enwiki to make it easier to anti-vandalism here (aside from rollback right). Thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ (Talk) 10:02, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback[edit]
Hello, I am requesting rollback permissions as I would like to utilize tools such as Huggle, which require this permission. I have been actively patrolling recent changes using a custom filter and have consistently notified users whose edits I have reverted. Thanks, – AllCatsAreGrey (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I have been on wikipedia for a few years & I've made over 1600 edits on the english wikipedia, and I've made over 7700 edits on wikimedia commons. I have reverted many vandalizing edits on a varierty of articles, and I've left many notices of these reverts on their talk pages. I've also made a few pages, mostly redirects, but I've also created other articles, including List of Agriotes species, Choristostreptus, and 1854 in Mexico. Having rollback privileges would make it much more efficient for me when undoing vandalism. No matter the decision, thanks so much! -Fneskljvnl🪱 (Contributions, Talk) (stay silly forever) 02:38, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I'm a long-time user on Wikipedia (have experience with rollback rights on my home Wiki), recently I'm actively using support tools to prevent cross-wiki vandalism (including enwiki). I'd like to be granted rollback rights on enwiki to make it more convenient to rollback here. Thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ 10:56, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
Reapplying. When I applied around 2 weeks ago I didn't have that many mainspace edits and was declined based on that (but given PCR) - [[6]]. I haven't used PCR that much, but I've made contributions elsewhere with CSD, AfC and files. I still believe Rollback will improve my ability to fight vandalism on Wikipedia. I'm fine with waiting longer though if I need a bit more experience elsewhere. Nahida 🌷 15:10, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello admins, I’m requesting rollback rights so that I may contribute more efficiently to counter-vandalism work using Twinkle. Destinyokhiria (talk) 21:14, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi. I would like to request for rollback rights to fight and detect the vandalism and revert unconstructive edits more easily. I am familier with the relevant policies related to vandalism and also with WP:Rollback. Thank You ! Fade258 (talk) 08:57, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello 🙏 My temporary rollback rights is expiring soon. I’ve used rollback right responsibly to revert vandalism. Would kindly like to request permanent rollback permission to continue this work. Thank you. Rahmatula786 (talk) 07:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
I am request this right because lately, there has been a lot of vandalism during the evening to night hours. I could not revert all of it because I had to click the article, go to view history, and undo. With this, I could much more easily revert vandalism. Please note that my account is pretty new, but I had an account before with around 1 year experience; that account was when I lived in Chicago, the reason I cannot access the account is because I forgot the username and password (it was a created a while ago). Thank you for your consideration of this request. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 21:05, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights. Have undone multiple vandalism attempts on K. Chandrashekar Rao and Revanth Reddy. Having the rollback permission will be helpful to quickly revert multiple edits. Skratata69 (talk) 17:17, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request rollback rights for my account in order to prevent pages from vandalism etc, Thanks! 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 17:48, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I will love to request for the rollback permission so I can help fight against vandalism and revert unconstructive edits, I’m also interested to use the wp:ANVDL tool to detect vandalism more easily. I believe meet the requirements and I took the feedbacks after my last request was declined over the last 1 month, I’ve been actively patrolling recent changes since then and I’m here again. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 06:47, 14 May 2025 (UTC) |
I am at about 70,000 edits aross all Wiki projects.

![]() |
The Minor Barnstar | |
Minor edits make a major difference. —Gaff ταλκ 04:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Minor Barnstar | |
Ahh, a sigh of relief from IvoShandor to Rmhermen, thanks for your work on articles related to the Black Hawk War. IvoShandor 05:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
This barnstar is for that quick and poisonous work you did on the Ayina River. Yours sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:52, 15 November 2010 (UTC) |
Templates I use often but never remember
[edit]- {{NorthAmNative}} {{WikiProject Michigan}} {{WikiProject Protected areas}} {{river}}
- (Wikipedia:Template_messages/Image_namespace)
- {{fact}}{{no license}} {{no source}} {{or-fu-re|Image:replacementimage}} {{Orphaned fairuse not replaced or {{or-fu-nr}} *{{PD-USGov-Interior-NPS}} {{subst:deletedpage}} {{globalize/USA}}{{intro-missing}}
![]() |
WP:AIV | WP:ANI | ![]() |
WP:NPP | ![]() |
WP:RPP | ![]() |
WP:RFR | ![]() |
WP:AFD | ![]() |
WP:XFD | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
CAT:CSD | ![]() |
WP:CSD | ![]() |
WP:RM | ![]() |
WP:RAA | ![]() |
WP:DR | ![]() |
WP:TM | ![]() |
WP:TT | ||||||
![]() |
WP:RCU | ![]() |
WP:LOP | ![]() |
CAT:AB | ![]() |
WP:BS | ![]() |
WP:RD | ![]() |
WP:NFC | ![]() |
WP:IUP |
Help box by Jennavecia (talk · contribs)
"Do you want to take a survey?"
[edit]On Feb. 12, 2005, I did a random pages survey. Out of 100 random pages, only 1 was a U.S. town. That's progress. Three towns in the UK, 1 in Spain and 1 in Portugal also turned up. Overall biographies were the largest category at 22%, followed by geography with 15% total. Then Lists at 7%, Disambiguation pages at 6%.
On Feb. 24, 2006, I repeated the 100 random page survey, this time getting 5 U.S. towns. Overall, geography had 26%, biography 21%, fiction 9%, music 4%, colleges 4%, lists 3% and disambigs 4%. Clearly geography and biography are our largest areas. Music, science and business scored less than I expected. Non-individual History was hardly discernable.
Even by Feb. 2005, 100 out of almost 500,000 was not statistically significant but was as much as I had patience for.
Wikiprojects I am a member of:
[edit]- Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Rivers
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Space missions
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Michigan
Short To Do list
[edit]- add maps to cities in Chad
- have done ten largest plus A-Biltine (plus Doba, Faya-Largeau, Goz Beïda, Guéréda, Mao, Ouara) from List of cities in Chad
- sources for Hook and Cod wars
- History of camping
- User:Rmhermen/sandbox
- reduce repetition between Chemical Weapons Convention, Chemical weapon proliferation, Destruction of chemical weapons, Chemical weapon#Disposal and Chemical warfare
- Pueblo Chemical Depot - full destruction in Sept 2016
- Joan Walsh Anglund
Early Anon work, no need to bug the developers
[edit]Up to Dec 16, 2003, all the edits at these anonymous id's were mine (59 edits):
- User:64.152.154.140
- User:64.152.153.104
- User:166.90.233.102
- User:65.25.234.xxx
- User:64.7.163.180
- User:64.152.153.139
- User:63.212.148.98
- User:64.152.159.57
- User:64.152.154.147
More recently 1,250 or so edits on 75.41.110.200 are apparently all mine. Apparently my new ID is 75.41.109.190. There are undoubtedly many others as the earliest history of many articles was not preserved by the software.
List of most of my original pictures and some maps
[edit]For copyright declaration purposes The following photographs and diagrams on Wikipedia were taken by and uploaded by me and released under GNU-FDL:
- Update March 21, 2006 by searching with Interiot's Tool (no longer updated - [11] does edit counts though)
Pictures
[edit]Maps
[edit]- Image:Michigan map.png
- Image:Toledo Strip.png
- Image:Les Cheneaux Islands.PNG
- Image:Blackfeet Indian Reservation map.PNG
- Image:1999_west_nile_map.png, and the others in article
- Image:US execution methods.png
- Image:Lake of Egypt.PNG - an unimproved map
- Image:Upper Peninsula of Michigan.png
Numerous locator maps for U.S. national parks like Image:LocMap Big Bend National Park.png and Image:LocMap Tongariro National Park.png - most now replaced by dynamic map system