Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship
 | This is not the page to nominate yourself or another editor to be an administrator. To do so, please follow these instructions. |
| No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
| Candidate | Type | Result | Date of close | Tally | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | O | N/A | % | ||||
| Chaotic Enby | RfA | Successful | 3 Nov 2025 | 255 | 1 | 0 | >99 |
| Rjjiii | RfA | Successful | 1 Nov 2025 | 170 | 0 | 1 | 100 |
| Toadspike | RfA | Successful | 9 Oct 2025 | 245 | 0 | 1 | 100 |
1 additional monitor needed for administrator elections
[edit]Hello friends. WP:AELECT3 is looking for one additional administrator to serve as a monitor. If you are willing to do it, please add your name at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections#Post in this section to volunteer to be a monitor for AELECT3 in December (need 2). I am posting on this talk page since (in my opinion) being a monitor of an RFA is very similar to being a monitor for administrator elections. The main differences are that for AELECT, there's multiple monitors and multiple pages. Thanks! –Novem Linguae (talk) 18:15, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
AELECT Header
[edit]Should we include {{Administrator elections/Latest/Header}} as part of WP:RfA somewhere? I've asked a similar question at WT:AELECT regarding whether we should include {{Rfx report}} and/or {{Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Recent}}, where it was suggested to include the AELECT header here. fanfanboy (blocktalk) 13:23, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- I don't think that's necessary, it's a fairly large header and wouldn't fit anywhere but the top of the page, which seems inappropriate. Toadspike [Talk] 13:32, 3 November 2025 (UTC)