Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lovemark

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Those contributors who really want to recreate it as a redirect to love-bite are free to do so. Postdlf 01:51, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lovemark

Poorly written article about an obscure term. "Official" website is dead. Delete. --Sn0wflake 18:26, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Delete neologism.--InShaneee 18:38, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 05:35, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Redirect to Love-bite. Megan1967 10:19, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Redirect to Love-bite. Strange, the website works for me! Looks to me like an advertising campaign based on Love-bites. So maybe someone could add a Trivia section there? Somethng like "this term inspired this marketing campaign" or whatnot. Master Thief Garrett 00:03, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.