Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Envelope paradox

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash 01:57, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Envelope paradox

There is no paradox. The logic is ridiculous. The value of "A" isn't a set amount, it's a VARIABLE. It could be a certain neverchanging monetary value "B" or it could be half of "B". So how can you tell whether you've made a profit if if you don't know what "A" is? 159.134.245.44 00:58, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: the logical fallacies of the argument are treated in the article itself. See Category:Paradoxes for a million similar examples. —Wahoofive (talk) 04:14, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, what paradox doesn't reflect a mistake in reasoning? This paradox is cited. Gazpacho 01:34, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as above. Trollderella 02:00, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.