Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advance Britannia Fair
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate wasdelete. Woohookitty 11:29, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This is an unverified 'article' with a wholly inappropriate tone. Googling the term produces 3 hits - all to this article! Eddie.willers 00:55, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Submitted probably by an Australian who wanted to eulogize his own anthem at the expense of others. Delete. --Titoxd 01:19, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Hoax, unverifiable. Mind you, this crap has been hanging around for almost a month now. Author probably got lost on the way to Uncyclopedia. This would have been destroyed by countdown deletion without the need for further action. :-) JRM · Talk 01:24, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete hoax. Jaxl | talk 01:30, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete hoax EdwinHJ | Talk 03:01, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't even think it's trying to be a hoax. It's more of a satirical Op/Ed piece. Complete POV. -PlainSight 04:42, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; Hoax | Celcius 04:42, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, if true, I would expect BBC news to have reported it, but since it's a hoax, they didn't. - Mgm|(talk) 09:08, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
- BJAODN. Despite it's assumed POV (which it has to take for the joke to work), I found this side-splittingly funny. My guess is that it's written by Cardiff Uni. student(s). Alf 12:00, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- >Bad jokes This seems like the fruit of some student's spare hour, too. It belongs more on Uncyclopedia than here. IINAG 13:49, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - hoax article written in a horrendous tone. Rob Church Talk | Desk 02:43, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. Hoax article. *drew 21:57, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.