Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thesubmachine

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:01, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thesubmachine

Secret society of 30 members, on the internet you say?!. Delete PubLife 11:50, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm honored that I've been invited to vote. Delete! --DrTorstenHenning 13:00, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unverifiable. Also non-notable, vanity, etc. Plus, don't we have a rule that any page containing the word "prestigious" is a valid candidate for speedy deletion? We don't? Are you sure? Dpbsmith (talk) 16:00, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Cabal? No. Never. -Splash 16:23, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I belong to the secret society of Delete, which recently decreed to eliminate this article while sacrificing 100 goats to Xenu ;-) Karmafist 19:05, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
A highly secret, extensively vetted, and gentlemen only vote to Delete. Dottore So 19:25, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If it's going to be unverifiable and secret, it should at least be more exciting than "an orgy of food and drink". Boojum 20:12, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, icky. Zoe 20:57, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, it's unverifiable. Although, I am not sure what's wrong with "an orgy of food and drink" ;) Trollderella 22:01, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable. *drew 00:44, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.