Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plum Canary
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Pages for deletion/Plum Canary)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. No consensus to delete. Page was hacked down to remove advertising component. --Tony SidawayTalk 05:17, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- See the talk page for details about a post-discussion challenge to the result, and the ensuing re-opening of the discussion. --Tony SidawayTalk 20:41, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Advertising Grayum 17:26, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Most of the article is about the material already covered on the Chirp software page, and is clearly advertising in nature. The article should be chopped back to a paragraph, if this company is at all notable. — RJH 17:55, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nn software. Sdedeo 21:56, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, advertising. --Carnildo 22:46, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and Clean Up - I've deleted the advertising in an effort to turn it into a neutral corporate stub. This sofware is noteable because it is unique, and it appears to have a following. Jehochman 03:36, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable. *drew 01:37, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - (Just a vote by the page creator.) A case has been made that the material is covered in the Chirp software page, which itself is subject to a VfD process at the moment. It's possible a reasonable path is to delete the Chirp software page and simply let it have it's information in the Project Management Software product table, then leave this "corporate stub" page (we *do* have a user community, which can justify the entry) solely for the purpose of maintaining links from that table. Note that the Grayum's comment no longer applies after the edit by jehochman. Batsonjay
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.