Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halfhide

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sasquatch讲看 03:38, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

Halfhide, Amsterdam Songwriters Guild, Reaganesk, Arthur ten Cate, Robin Block and Selma Peelen

No evidence of notability. The search term "Halfhide" gets 13,000 hits but few of them are him. His blog is titled "When will Halfhide be famous?" and says "Producer, musician, labelmanager... Eventually I'll turn these words into careers." I think he is jumping the gun here. -- DS1953 12:46, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

Per the suggestions below, I am adding the other pages to this nomination.

Comment. I have greeted the User:Juiceboyy whose user page states "Juiceboyy is the login name of Halfhide" and pointed him here. Alf 17:56, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, likely to be Userfy. Alf 17:57, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nn, vanity page. DS1953: See the related Amsterdam Songwriters Guild, which this user also wrote; I think it should also be nominated for deletion. Dottore So 19:31, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And all the links from there, some stubs started in March. Alf 22:08, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A nod to DS1953. I formally extend my vote to delete all of these entries. Dottore So 23:40, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable. *drew 00:48, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Ok, guys. I understand why you want to delete these pages. I just don't like the hidden presumption that I'm willfully spoiling the Wikipedia. I guess I don't understand the vibe here. It seems every entry has to be interesting. Wikipedia apparently has no ambition to reflect the real world, where there are also little known initiatives. Or is it the fact that I'm involved in the above mentioned entries? How else are you getting people motivated to write an article? It's either interest or involvement. I now learned involvement is not done. So be it. But I didn't mean to do harm. Good luck with the Wiki. -- Juiceboyy 19:14, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.