Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EVE iPortal

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. R e dwolf24 (talk) 04:27, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

EVE iPortal

Current content appears to be advertising material. Google search for "EVE iPortal" returns 5 hits, making this non-notable. Rob Church ^{Talk | Desk} 02:17, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is a valid unique technology. A more generic search for EVE and the company X-tier on Google does turn this up on many technology related sites and is a valid technology. One such is UMBC Agent Web. It should not be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.142.63.20 (talk) 02:29, 27 August 2005‎ (UTC) –Comment merged here from content previously at this title[reply]
I disagree. A more general search "EVE X-tier" turns up the technology in the same context as Microsoft, and Sun technologies. A google search returned over 8 pages of conversation, exceprts, articles on this technology. Since when do search hits dictate notability? I see no violation here and vote for it to remain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.142.63.20 (talk) 02:39, 27 August 2005‎ (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Dottore So 03:15, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete advertising, NN Groeck 04:09, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete advertising, POV, NN. MCB 06:48, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per the people above. Also, as a general rule, I am suspicious of any page that has an exclamation mark on it. -Ashley Pomeroy 14:48, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.