Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truth in Numbers?

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-14 11:50Z

Truth in Numbers: The Wikipedia Story

Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, valy non notable documentary film (Google only 241 hits) and fan film. Lopineg 12:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - self-referential, non-notable and crystal-balling fancruft. Ooh, I have 40000 edits, do I get to be on the film as well? MER-C 12:34, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - murky crystal ball-ery. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 18:44, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. —dima/s-ko/ 01:59, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
weak delete Spring 08 is too long a stretch.DGG 02:36, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete per reasons given so far. It may become notable and verifiably referenced in time, but it doesn't seem to be now. It's just too soon. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 00:36, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep References have been added. Also, article is not crystal-balling as it refers to a living, real-time collaborative media document as well as an upcoming feature film (no doubt the filmmakers would love to hear from deeply experienced editors as to why they might think a documentary film about Wikipedia would be non-notable or 'depressing'; this would be a great point in a film which is still very much open to the broadest possible public input. Be bold:wikidocumentary.org.) -- MFG 08:58, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now per Mermaid from the Baltic Sea. And why haven't I been asked to appear? Geez! (that's a joke). --kingboyk 15:06, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm too depressed by the very thought of this film to type out a full rational reason for deletion. Please accept my apologies. Cloveoil 23:26, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and the one reference only mentions it near the end. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 22:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.