User talk:The Earwig
This is The Earwig's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18Auto-archiving period: 2 months ![]() |
Revdel-responder
[edit]Hi, just recently I'm getting occasional errors with revdel.responder.js where it fails to parse the page content. When I look at the console this is the error I see reported. It's not happening all the time just on some articles. Nthep (talk) 16:03, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry I didn't reply to this. I haven't been able to reproduce this issue, even on the page/revision in your screenshot. If it's still happening, let me know. — The Earwig (talk) 22:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2025
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2025).

- Sign up for The Core Contest, a competition running from 15 April to 31 May to improve vital articles.
The Signpost: 9 April 2025
[edit]- Opinion: Crawlers, hogs and gorillas
- Debriefing: Giraffer's RfA debriefing
- Obituary: RHaworth, TomCat4680 and PawełMM
- Traffic report: Heigh-Ho, Heigh-Ho, off to report we go...
- News from Diff: Strengthening Wikipedia’s neutral point of view
- Comix: Thirteen
revdel-responder
[edit]Any chance you could tweak this script so that the copyvios report automatically linked next to the URL is a comparison of that URL to the first revision in the range, rather than to the current page? It would really speed things up. -- asilvering (talk) 03:55, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Hi asilvering, revdel-responder's "Compare" button should already do that? Or are you interested in the link working when there are multiple URLs? This will need to be fixed in {{Copyvio-revdel}} directly. — The Earwig (talk) 04:10, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- No, it doesn't. Take American Basketball Association, for example. The copyvio comparison link next to the URL takes me to [1]. But the link I actually want is [2]. -- asilvering (talk) 04:19, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- asilvering, the revdel-responder script adds a "Compare" button as seen in this screenshot. Clicking on that brings me to [3] which I believe is the correct link. The link next to the URL is part of the template, not the script. Someone can fix that too, I'm just trying to confirm I understand your request. — The Earwig (talk) 05:44, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- oh lol, I'm an idiot. Don't mind me. -- asilvering (talk) 17:47, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- asilvering, the revdel-responder script adds a "Compare" button as seen in this screenshot. Clicking on that brings me to [3] which I believe is the correct link. The link next to the URL is part of the template, not the script. Someone can fix that too, I'm just trying to confirm I understand your request. — The Earwig (talk) 05:44, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- No, it doesn't. Take American Basketball Association, for example. The copyvio comparison link next to the URL takes me to [1]. But the link I actually want is [2]. -- asilvering (talk) 04:19, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 May 2025
[edit]- In the media: Feds aiming for WMF's nonprofit status
- Recent research: How readers use Wikipedia health content; Scholars generally happy with how their papers are cited on Wikipedia
- Arbitration report: Sysop Tinucherian removed and admonished by the ArbCom
- Discussion report: Latest news from Centralized discussions
- Traffic report: Of Wolf and Man
- Disinformation report: At WikiCredCon, Wikipedia editors and Internet Archive discuss threats to trust in media
- News from the WMF: Product & Tech Progress on the Annual Plan
- Comix: By territory
- Community view: A deep dive into Wikimedia
- Debriefing: Barkeep49's RfB debriefing
Administrators' newsletter – May 2025
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2025).

Rusalkii
NaomiAmethyst (overlooked last month)
Interface administrator changes
- Following an RfC, administrator elections were permanently authorized on a five-month schedule. The next election will be scheduled soon; see Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections for more information. This is an alternate process to the RfA process and does not replace the latter.
- An RfC was closed with consensus to allow editors to opt-out of seeing "sticky decorative elements". Such elements should now be wrapped in {{sticky decoration wrapper}}. Editors who wish to opt out can follow the instructions at WP:STICKYDECO.
- An RfC has resulted in a broad prohibition on the use of AI-generated images in articles. A few common-sense exceptions are recognized.
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in May 2025 to reduce the backlog of articles in the new pages feed. Sign up here to participate!
The Signpost: 14 May 2025
[edit]- In the media: Wikimedia Foundation sues over UK government decision that might require identity verification of editors worldwide
- Disinformation report: What does Jay-Z know about Wikipedia?
- Technology report: WMF introduces unique but privacy-preserving browser cookie
- Debriefing: Goldsztajn's RfA debriefing
- Obituary: Max Lum (User:ICOHBuzz)
- Community view: A Deep Dive Into Wikimedia (part 2)
- Comix: Collection
- From the archives: Humor from the Archives
Request of setting up the js of your copyright vio detector in zh-wiki
[edit]Hi @The Earwig, may I ask for your permission to set up the js of your copyright detector by myself or can you please set up the js of the detector in zh wiki? Ghostingb (talk) 21:53, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Ghostingb, you are asking to copy the script to zhwiki? That’s fine with me, please go ahead. — The Earwig alt (talk) 22:54, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Wonderful, thx for the permission. Ghostingb (talk) 22:55, 28 May 2025 (UTC)