Jump to content

User talk:CFynn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Cfynn)


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

CFynn (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 118.103.143.41. ISP is Tashi Cell Bhutan. Chris Fynn (talk) 09:53, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I have renewed your IP block exemption, which should fix the issue for a year. Apologies for the inconvenience, please let me know if you run into problems again when the exemption has expired. --Blablubbs (talk) 16:24, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Blablubbs: Thanks for your help with this. Chris Fynn (talk) 12:37, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article David Germano has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

guy is not important enough

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

[edit]

Dear CFynn,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. Additionally, if I may speak on behalf of the WikiProject Buddhism community, congratulations on this milestone. It is heartwarming to see you as an active user after all these years. Take good care, my friend. Namo Buddhaya!​

Best regards, Usedbook (talk) 18:56, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

[edit]
You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

[edit]
Hey, CFynn. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Wiki-Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 03:34, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

a question concerning Tibetan script

[edit]

Hello Chris, I hope you can help with an issue with Tibetan script on maps.wikimedia.org which gets its data from openstreetmap.org (OSM) where I'm actively mapping. Recently I stumbled on an official .gov.tr sourced pdf file for Tibet listing official place names in Chinese and Tibetan. I've started to add even village names in Tibetan for places in Tibet using OSM. Today I had a controlling look on an area on Wikimedia maps using lang=bo parameter but noticed that some squares show up inside the village names. These squares did not show up on my pc or the map editor while editing so it may be an script issue either of the official source pdf or a wrong font for displaying Tibetan script correctly in Wikimedia maps. Do you have an idea? Greetings, --katpatuka (talk) 14:24, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Katpatuka: " The square boxes usually mean the that the font being used for display doesn't properly support the character, or combination of characters. There can also be problems with the text rendering engine being used on the client system.
Which font is used for Tibetan language will be controlled by the CSS stylesheet used by Wikimedia maps; (you'd probably need someone with high level privileges to get that changed) - if no particular font for Tibetan language and script is specified there, the display will probably fall back to the default font for Tibetan used by the client browser or operating system.
Two open source Tibetan fonts that can be embedded through CSS are: Uchen and Jomolhari
There can also be many problems with complex scripts like Tibetan if you try and cut and paste text from PDF files - if that is what you are doing - you may need to retype the Tibetan in the Wikimedia maps or Open Street Map editor.
I wouldn't rely too much on the "official" PRC place names for Tibet (the Chinese often mess up the Tibetan). The best reference is probably: Farmer, Michael(2022); An Atlas of the Tibetan Plateau Leiden: Brill. ISBN:978-90-04-49868-6 . All the names in Tibetan script may be found in the indexes at the back of that book, a PDF copy of which may be downloaded from the publisher's web site.
-- Chris Fynn (talk) 21:50, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your advice. Unfortunately there aren't many people around capable to edit in Tibetan - I can only copy and paste and hope that it's correct . Chinese sources are where sparse too so I was really happy finding such a pdf file. Tibetan place names found in wikipedia/wikidata do not produce such squares as far as I see. I'll try to create a phabricator bug... katpatuka (talk) 05:56, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You won't get those squares when cutting and pasting from Wikipedia or Wikidata files because these contain plain text data. PDF files look like text but they are in fact a form of PostScript printer files originally containing printer instructions instead of text. These instructions rather than storing just e,g. the letter A, say put a particular glyph outline shape (referenced by the glyph name used in the original font rather than a character) at a specific x, y con=ordinate on the page (whether printed or displayed on a screen). When you cut and paste from a PDF file the original text is reconstructed using the glyph names in the font and mapping these back to text characters. This works perfectly for latin script text as the standard glyph names in Latin script fonts correspond directly to the letters of the Latin/Roman alphabet. However when it comes to text in non-roman scripts there are all sorts of complications (which I won't go into further here). Some of these problems may be overcome by using enhanced forms of PDF such as PDF/UA but this has to be chosen at the time the original pdf file was created - and the software application used to create the pdf file has to properly support that enhanced type of PDF. Anyway this type of problem seems to be the source of your squares which is the default glyph displayed when there is such an error - and known as the missing character glyph.
There is no real workaround other than manually correcting the places where these squares occur. Another way might be to use OCR to convert PDF to Unicode text. (There are recently some OCR applications that work well with Tibetan text). Chris Fynn (talk) 06:34, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clarifying the pdf issue. In the meantime I found another source under Geographical names of Tibet which looks much more promising . katpatuka (talk) 07:17, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]