User talk:Beeblebrox
No RfXs since 19:36, 23 April 2025 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online |

V | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
TfD | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 |
MfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
FfD | 0 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 12 |
RfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 83 | 83 |
AfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- 11 bot-reported usernames for administrator attention
- 2 user-reported usernames for administrator attention
- 17 bot-generated requests for intervention against vandalism
- 5 user-generated requests for intervention against vandalism
- 30 sockpuppet investigations
- 27 Candidates for speedy deletion
- 0 Fully protected edit requests
- 0 Candidates for history merging
- 6 requests for RD1 redaction
- 108 elapsed requested moves
- 6 Pages at move review
- 34 requested closures
- 86 requests for unblock
- 0 Wikipedians looking for help from administrators
- 28 Copyright problems
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
Clarification request: Off-wiki misconduct in Palestine–Israel topic area | none | none | 26 April 2025 |
Clarification request: Palestine-Israel articles 5 (balanced editing restriction) | none | (orig. case) | 6 April 2025 |
Amendment request: Topic banned | Motion | (orig. case) | 18 April 2025 |
Motion name | Date posted |
---|---|
Smallangryplanet and Lf8u2 | 26 April 2025 |
−
- The article was deleted after an Articles for Deletion discussion. However, I believe that the decision should be reconsidered because I can provide additional reliable sources that establish the company’s notability. If possible, I would like the article restored as a user draft so I can improve it and resubmit it through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process. Thank you. Sukikowsik (talk) 05:29, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Sukikowsik: You may find you get better results when starting a new conversation if you use the "new section" button instead of replying to an existing post that is not relevant to what you are trying to discuss, and maybe provide some context and a header, as I have now done.
- I don't think there is any grounds to reconsider the result of the deletion discussion as consensus was clear, with three comments in favor of deletion and none in favor of keeping, However, as you state you believe you cvan rectify the issues identified I have restored it as a regular draft at Draft:Samugam Media. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 20:53, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Do me a favor would you?
[edit]And take a look at WP:LASTWORD. Logoshimpo (talk) 18:06, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not really active right now and frankly don't recall whatever it is you are vaguely complaining about, but I'm guessing that if I did recall I probably don't care anyway.
- So how about you do me a favor and either make coherent comments with an actual purpose or go away? Thanks. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 20:45, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
I’m in need of editing advice
[edit]Hello, I was wondering if you could give me some advice and tips on how to become a better editor? I feel as if I’m not good enough, and you’re the most talented/professional editor I could find. Please reach back when you can :).
Sincerely and with Admiration, TJ Kreen TJ Kreen (talk) 23:05, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2025
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2025).

- Sign up for The Core Contest, a competition running from 15 April to 31 May to improve vital articles.
editor interaction review
[edit]Would you mind reviewing this discussion, as well as the corresponding edits in that article history? I'm having trouble explaining policies & guidelines with another editor, as clearly and thoroughly as I can, and my interactions are being characterized by the other party as "dismissive", "hostile", "rude", and 'trying to "win"'.
My apologies for showing up here, uninvited, but I think you're the only remaining administrator who's had hands-on experience with this editor (your involvement was here). I'm not trying to involve you in the article dispute, itself, but I think ChrisP2K5 has intentionally stalled or empassed the discussion, and I'm not sure what the way forward looks like. Thanks for your time, — Fourthords | =Λ= | 14:40, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not really active right now, this looks rather involved, and I can't say I recall the one interaction we had nearly fifteen years ago. However there is still one other admin who commented there, who probably also doesn't remember it but is currently active, perhaps @JBW: would like to take a look? Beeblebrox Beebletalks 21:57, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- 10-4, I'll drop them the same line. Thanks! — Fourthords | =Λ= | 22:42, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Take a kitten, as a reward for all the wonderful things you do for Wikipedia.
[edit]Love ya! :)