Jump to content

User:Andy M. Wang/AndymwBot/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Andy M. Wang/AndymwBot/sandbox/Header

Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP users changing this actress' birth year without citation of a reliable source, with these edits occurring on and just after the actress' birthday. MPFitz1968 (talk) 22:37, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Katniss 01:58, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is essentially IP 24.xxx Lectonar (talk) 12:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. TJH2018talk 02:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 12:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of non-notable awards. 001Jrm (talk) 06:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 12:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Subject of article is involved in a current event (she is a politician who was shot/stabbed). Requesting temporary pp because of incorrect/unsourced information being added by ips and new users. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 13:50, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Declined I see relatively few edits like that by IPs or new user; people are just frantic. The article is well watched because of the actual event, and very much under control. Relist if it picks up please. Lectonar (talk) 14:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Lectonar IP vandalism has increased in last 30ish minutes, can we have semi-protection? Joseph2302 (talk) 16:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Done See report below. NeilN talk to me 16:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30, but gets lots of vandalism by "new" editors and IPs. Huldra (talk) 14:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30, but gets lots of vandalism by IPs. Huldra (talk) 14:20, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Shanta Ronaldo abuse/hoaxing has resumed again recently. McGeddon (talk) 15:53, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:09, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spate from unregistered/unconfirmed/IP accounts. At least pending changes but really - anything would be a help. Vandals are at it again today. Shearonink (talk) 17:13, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protection: IP vandalism of adding false dates and opening act. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 17:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism/edit warring the introduction of a typo and an inaccuracy (at last Google search Lisa Thiel has not left the program). Launchballer 17:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The Benfica player has signed a contract with Atlético Madrid, but it only be effective in July. SLBedit (talk) 18:01, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2602:306:3357:BA0:BDE3:83A5:201D:4B1F (talk) 18:05, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:14, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]

Before posting a request for unprotection, please discuss it with the protecting administrator first. You can create a request below only if you receive no response from them.

To find out which administrator protected the page, go to the page's edit history and click on the "View logs for this page" link (located underneath the page's title). The protecting administrator is listed in the protection log entry, next to the words "protected", "changed protection level", or "configured pending changes". If there are a large number of log entries on the page, use the drop-down menu near the top of the page and select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" to filter the logs accordingly.

DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...

  • ...you are being prevented from editing the page. A desire to change content is not a valid reason for unprotection. Instead:
    • If you can edit the article's talk page, use the WP:Edit Request Wizard to propose a change on the article's talk page. Include an explanation of the exact content that you want to change, and what the content will be afterward.
    • If the article's talk page is protected, you may propose a change at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit.
  • ...your reasoning for reducing protection is that the article has not been vandalized. That simply means the protection is working as intended.
  • ...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details.
  • ...you haven't contacted the protecting administrator.

You may request a protection reduction below if...

  • ...you want to change the protection level of a template or module from full protection to template protection. You may add the request to this page without having to discuss it with the protecting administrator first.
  • ...you need to remove creation protection from a location where no page exists (redlinked pages) after a draft version of the intended article is prepared beforehand and ready to be published.
  • ...you are proposing a trial reduction in protection for a page that has been protected for several years, provided the proposal is supported by evidence such as talk page activity, page views, page traffic, number of watchers, frequency of edit requests, and prior history of vandalism.
  • ...the protecting administrator is inactive or has not responded to you in several days.

If you cannot locate your request, make sure to check the request archives to see if it's been moved there. Only requests that have been recently answered will still be listed here.

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]

Requests for specific edits should be made on the talk page of the protected article. You can create an edit request below only if the talk page is also protected, preventing you from adding a request there.

Otherwise, this is the correct place to use in order to add an edit request if you are unable to add one to the article's talk page. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to properly add a request.

Handled requests

[edit]

A rolling archive of the last seven days of protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive.