Talk:Mixed-member proportional representation

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mixed-member proportional representation article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums

Archives

Archive 1

Comparison to Party-list proportional representation

Can anyone (add a section to) explain the difference between MMP and Party-list proportional representation? I tried to read both articles, and I couldn't see any major differences. The later system has been used much longer than since 1945. At least I know Denmark has been using it since 1915.

Please translate this page in hindi language

"Mixed member proportional representation" hindi very is not available. Please translate this page in hindi language Shakilsayed (talk) 17:18, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Shakilsayed Unfortunately, not many contributors to English Wikipedia will know Hindi. The good news is article translation is very easy, and I think you should try it out! Wikipedia provides an automatic machine translation tool for converting articles from one language to another, which you can find over at Wikipedia:Content translation tool. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 02:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

South Africa

The new electoral system in South Africa is called MMP on the page, but the source here doesn't call it this way, and the system described isn't MMP. With MMP, there's one vote for a fixed number of consistuency seats, and a second vote for proportional, which is used to add as many seats as needed to correct the results in seats to achieve a proportional repartition of the total seats by parties as close as possible to the repartition of the second votes. Here in SA, the system described is two proportional system acting independently to get a fixed total of seats which then add up to each other. That's Parallel voting, not MMP. Cf Talk:2024 South African general election Aréat (talk) 05:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"any seats as needed to correct the results in seats to achieve a proportional repartition of the total seats by parties as close as possible" - that's not independent, therefore definitely not parallel voting, it is described as compensatory. Currently I don't see this page as listing it as MMP (the national one). Since the lower tier is also proportional, I don't think it qualifies as MMP or even a mixed system, since it's not even that the two subsystems are different, both are close list except one allows independents. But it is compensatory multi-tier like many proportional systems. Rankedchoicevoter (talk) 11:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]