Talk:Java Platform Module System

Java Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software / Java Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Java (assessed as Mid-importance).

Should the page be renamed into "Java Platform Module System" according to JSR 376? There are already some articles which refer to it by JPMS abbreviations:

https://www.infoq.com/articles/java9-osgi-future-modularity
http://blog.osgi.org/2016/08/java-module-layers-and-osgi-bundles.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by UVSMTID (talk • contribs) 07:12, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Better late than never, it's done Hervegirod (talk) 13:37, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removal and censor of list

Hi User:Diannaa, you removed my list because it directly sourced copyrighted work, however you also completely redacted the edits from the page. I would like to have the edits back so that I may properly revise them to not quote the source verbatim. 24.50.56.74 (talk) 13:26, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not going to restore copyvio to Wikipedia, so sorry. If you had an account, I could send you the deleted material via email. Otherwise, you could go back to the source document and work from that. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:31, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you restore it momentarily allowing me to edit from there and then redact it once I have made the necessary changes? 24.50.56.74 (talk) 13:44, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I already said no to that. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:28, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well thanks I guess. 24.50.56.74 (talk) 16:14, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]