Jump to content

Related changes

← VLW6

Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.

Recent changes options Show last 50 | 100 | 250 | 500 changes in last 1 | 3 | 7 | 14 | 30 days
Hide registered users | Hide unregistered users | Hide my edits | Show bots | Hide minor edits | Show page categorization | Show Wikidata | Hide probably good edits
Show new changes starting from 23:21, 28 April 2025
 
Page name:
List of abbreviations (help):
D
Edit made at Wikidata
r
Edit flagged by ORES
N
New page
m
Minor edit
b
Bot edit
(±123)
Page byte size change
Temporarily watched page

28 April 2025

27 April 2025

  • diffhist Perth 00:24 +175 Shrubshire talk contribs (Undid revision 1287553458 by PastelLilac (talk)2 editors is not consensus. This isn't how wikipedia works. If you want to make changes to a long established status quo to a page, you must get consensus from the talk page, especially if there's opposition. It is not up to the editor retaining the status quo to get consensus for keeping the status quo) Tag: Undo
  • diffhist Perth 00:18 −175 PastelLilac talk contribs (Undid revision 1287552749 by Shrubshire (talk) it was user The Logical Positivist who added cotosloe beach, calling it a major landmark. i agree, far more important landmark than a foot bridge without its own page. since it's 2 against 1, i suggest you take it to the talk page) Tags: Undo Reverted
  • diffhist Perth 00:11 +175 Shrubshire talk contribs (Undid revision 1287482311 by PastelLilac (talk) No consensus for your changes. One editor does not get to decide what all pages on wikipedia should look like. Take it to the talk page first) Tags: Undo Reverted

26 April 2025

  • diffhist Perth 15:11 −175 PastelLilac talk contribs ("Another image of the landmark being featured in the body is not a reason to not use it in the infobox" yeah it is. and let's be real, the pedestrian bridge doesn't belong in the lead montage. it's a bit of photogenic modern infrastructure, not some iconic bridge like, say, the sydney harbour bridge. doesn't even have its own wiki page. cottosloe beach however is an undeniable cultural icon and part of perth's soul. far more deserving of a place in lead) Tags: Manual revert Reverted
  • diffhist Perth 14:26 +118 Shrubshire talk contribs (cottesloe can also be included in body) Tags: Reverted Visual edit
  • diffhist Perth 14:22 +57 Shrubshire talk contribs (Undid revision 1287449589 by PastelLilac (talk) the problem is that no has agreed on an alternative image to elizabeth quay, and there's no consensus that is should be changed. The bridge image has been used for more than a year now. Take it to the talk page for consensus on what to change it to. Another image of the landmark being featured in the body is not a reason to not use it in the infobox.) Tags: Undo Reverted
  • diffhist Perth 09:47 −57 PastelLilac talk contribs (image of bridge (a 'featured picture' at that) appears in history section. imo cottosloe beach more significant to perth, and adequately represents the "water", "space" and "people" another editor asked for) Tags: Manual revert Reverted
  • diffhist Perth 08:46 −33 Elrondil talk contribs (😀) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App full source
  • diffhist Perth 08:45 +94 Elrondil talk contribs (How about adding not just picture of buildings and structures? Or is that all there is to Perth?) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App section source
  • diffhist Perth 08:36 −4 Shrubshire talk contribs (reverting back to elizabeth quay bridge (was the long-term image for months) since there's no consensus on what should be used instead) Tags: Reverted Visual edit

22 April 2025

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:RecentChangesLinked/VLW6"