Related changes
Appearance
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
17 April 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 02:50 −2 Nikkimaria talk contribs (rv, aspects of these are still available)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 02:23 −3 Jc3s5h talk contribs (→Citation style: stray "and")
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 02:22 −24 Jc3s5h talk contribs (→Citation style: Remove citation styles that use parenthetical referencing, since that was deprecated in Wikipedia a few years ago.)
16 April 2025
15 April 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines 13:42 +27 W.andrea talk contribs (→Examples of appropriately editing others' comments: +{{shortcut|WP:TPFIXFORMAT}} on "Fixing format errors")
- diffhist User talk:Beeblebrox 00:31 +255 Evoimations talk contribs (→Take a kitten, as a reward for all the wonderful things you do for Wikipedia.: new WikiLove message) Tag: WikiLove
13 April 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:Signatures 06:08 +56 HouseBlaster talk contribs (ce; archive dead link)
12 April 2025
- diffhist User talk:Beeblebrox 22:42 +194 Fourthords talk contribs (→editor interaction review: + reply;)
- diffhist User talk:Beeblebrox 21:57 +418 Beeblebrox talk contribs (→editor interaction review: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reliable sources 13:28 −35 SmokeyJoe talk contribs (→top: per WP:LINKBOXES, with 90 day pageviews of 16986, 429, 880, 468, only WP:RS is justified as the recommended shortcut. All shortcuts will still work)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reliable sources 08:39 −10 Mathglot talk contribs (Undid revision 1285185074 by Rollinginhisgrave (talk) Seems like that means we can't we publish the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors anymore, unless someone else describes them, but that is not true. Or maybe the new wording doesn't mean that, so what does it mean? In any case, I read the Talk discussion, and it doesn't okay this wording.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reliable sources 05:07 +10 Rollinginhisgrave talk contribs (→Overview: opinions of reliable sources → opinions described in reliable sources per talk) Tag: Reverted