Related changes

Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.

Namespace:	Invert selection Associated namespace
Tag filter:	Invert selection
Page name:	Show changes to pages linked to the given page instead

List of abbreviations (help):

D: Edit made at Wikidata
r: Edit flagged by ORES
N: New page
m: Minor edit
b: Bot edit
(±123): Page byte size change
: Temporarily watched page

25 April 2025

diffhist The Lord of the Rings 18:23 −940 Chiswick Chap talk contribs (rv, we need to be much more specific than that; I think you must have just missed my message on your talk page, in your haste to redo your edit, which is called editwarring here on Wikipedia) Tag: Undo
diffhist The Lord of the Rings 18:20 +940 Brooksboy78 talk contribs (All of these sources are high-quality lists (from fantasy authors and academics) that show that the work is often considered one of the greatest fantasy works of all time. They all say the same thing. I can also, if necessary, paraphrase this information in the "Reception" section as well, and specifically bring up the reasons why these sources are high-quality.) Tags: Undo Reverted
diffhist The Lord of the Rings 18:16 −940 Verbarson talk contribs (Spamming this article with generic cites, without any reference to what those documents actually say (or, in the case of books, what pages they say it on) is not going to improve the article or our understanding of the work of Tolkien. Please read the documents, extract what they have to say about LOTR, and then update this article.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted
diffhist m The Lord of the Rings 18:10 +68 Brooksboy78 talk contribs (added the original newspaper clipping, as well as the full archive for one source.) Tag: Reverted
diffhist m The Lord of the Rings 17:38 +6 Brooksboy78 talk contribs Tag: Reverted
diffhist m The Lord of the Rings 17:31 +117 Brooksboy78 talk contribs (improving citations; i'm certain there are additional errors.) Tag: Reverted
diffhist m The Lord of the Rings 16:50 +1 Brooksboy78 talk contribs (added a needed space) Tag: Reverted
diffhist m The Lord of the Rings 16:43 −5 Brooksboy78 talk contribs (cosmetic change) Tag: Reverted
diffhist m The Lord of the Rings 16:31 +4 Brooksboy78 talk contribs Tag: Reverted
diffhist The Lord of the Rings 16:18 +139 Brooksboy78 talk contribs (TIME Magazine had a panel of leading fantasy authors to determine the greatest fantasy books of all time. These were: N.K. Jemisin, Neil Gaiman, Sabaa Tahir, Tomi Adeyemi, Diana Gabaldon, George R.R. Martin, Cassandra Clare and Marlon James.) Tag: Reverted
diffhist m The Lord of the Rings 16:14 +148 Brooksboy78 talk contribs (another high-quality source. full list here: https://thegreatestbooks.org/lists/300) Tag: Reverted
diffhist The Lord of the Rings 16:09 +277 Brooksboy78 talk contribs (Science Fiction Book Club a seminal organization centered around sci-fi and fantasy. Good source.) Tag: Reverted
diffhist The Lord of the Rings 16:04 +190 Brooksboy78 talk contribs (adding in high-quality secondary sources to corroborate claim.) Tag: Reverted
diffhist m The Lord of the Rings 15:38 +3 Brooksboy78 talk contribs (comma not necessary unless "it" it added.) Tag: Reverted
diffhist The Lord of the Rings 15:37 −8 Brooksboy78 talk contribs (not an opinion, literally any list out there of the greatest fantasy will have lotr on it. If you don't want to use thegreatestbooks.org by itself, that's fine. Look to all of the high-quality fantasy lists listed on that website. That's objectively far more than "one person's endeavor.") Tag: Reverted
diffhist The Lord of the Rings 08:26 +637 Chiswick Chap talk contribs (→Later: Unwin's assessment, ref)
diffhist The Lord of the Rings 07:40 +5 Chiswick Chap talk contribs (→top: small ce to make sentence work; this is well supported by the evidence)
diffhist The Lord of the Rings 07:35 −111 Scribolt talk contribs (Claim of greatest not supported in article (and that source on it's own is not sufficient, a one person endeavour to rank books using an algorithm doesn't outweigh the RS content in the body)). Currently the reception at the time is summarised as "mixed" and the later reception is almost entirely focusing on minor negatives. It's influence is clearly detailed, and an argument could also be be made for "one of the most popular" using the existing article.)
diffhist The Lord of the Rings 06:27 +8 Chiswick Chap talk contribs (thanks, but this is an encyclopedia; we state the plain facts, even if you feel they are obvious.) Tag: Undo
diffhist The Lord of the Rings 03:49 −8 LoverofBooks101 talk contribs (Considering LotR is on the top 10 on thegreatestbooks.org, is there really even a need to specify with "fantasy"? "Crime and Punishment" cites the same website to show that it's one of the greatest books of all time, and it's even further down than LotR.) Tag: Reverted

24 April 2025

diffhist m Nintendo DS 17:10 −18 Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four talk contribs (Undid revision 1287195773 by Pancakel0rd0 (talk). unsourced. you may be right, but you'll need sources to prove it.) Tag: Undo
diffhist m Nintendo DS 16:38 +18 Pancakel0rd0 talk contribs (short description) Tags: Reverted Visual edit
diffhist Pineapple 15:49 +28 Andikan Efiok Eduok talk contribs (→Cultivars: I added a photo)
diffhist m Nintendo DS 11:38 −43 Sergecross73 talk contribs (Reverted edit by 86.98.94.24 (talk) to last version by 195.252.220.146) Tag: Rollback
diffhist Nintendo DS 11:32 +43 86.98.94.24 talk (→History) Tag: Reverted
diffhist Wikipedia:Wikipediholism test 05:08 +8 Ramkarlo82 talk contribs Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
diffhist Wikipedia:Wikipediholism test 05:07 +196 Ramkarlo82 talk contribs Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
diffhist The Lord of the Rings 00:26 −9 Chiswick Chap talk contribs (rv, better as it was) Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
diffhist The Lord of the Rings 00:16 +9 49.224.110.194 talk Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

23 April 2025

diffhist Katamari Damacy 19:41 0 89.164.94.32 talk (Katamari Damacy was not released in 2002, but in 2004. There is no evidence that it was released in 2002, and infobox says otherwise. Where is your evidence other than your claim that it was in 2002? Look around wider in the web and you will see that the year 2004 is correct. Either you accidentally thought it was that year in your claim and put it or you put it intentionally and provided wrong information.) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

28 April 2025

27 April 2025

26 April 2025

25 April 2025

24 April 2025

23 April 2025