Related changes

Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.

Namespace:	Invert selection Associated namespace
Tag filter:	Invert selection
Page name:	Show changes to pages linked to the given page instead

List of abbreviations (help):

D: Edit made at Wikidata
r: Edit flagged by ORES
N: New page
m: Minor edit
b: Bot edit
(±123): Page byte size change
: Temporarily watched page

17 April 2025

diffhist Module:Template parameter value 13:28 −8 Ahecht talk contribs (Don't use sandbox)

16 April 2025

diffhist Module:Template parameter value 17:14 +150 Ahecht talk contribs (Support -1 template_index to get last instance of template)
diffhist m New York City 03:57 −4 Sedriskell talk contribs ("and" should not immediately follow a semicolon)

15 April 2025

diffhist New York City 16:46 −14 Yovt talk contribs (remove pipe and overlink)

14 April 2025

diffhist User talk:CanonNi 17:26 +553 Chorchapu talk contribs (→Question from Prakashkumarasamy95 (15:59, 6 April 2025): Reply) Tag: Reply
diffhist User talk:CanonNi 17:15 +540 Chorchapu talk contribs (→Question from Charlien.Weaver (20:06, 4 April 2025): Reply) Tag: Reply
diffhist m New York City 15:38 +10 David J Johnson talk contribs (Undid revision 1285577476 by Yovt (talk) Revert overlinking. Please read WP:OVERLINK) Tag: Undo
diffhist New York City 14:16 −10 Yovt talk contribs (undo pipe) Tag: Reverted

12 April 2025

diffhist Wikipedia:Reliable sources 13:28 −35 SmokeyJoe talk contribs (→top: per WP:LINKBOXES, with 90 day pageviews of 16986, 429, 880, 468, only WP:RS is justified as the recommended shortcut. All shortcuts will still work)
diffhist m Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting 12:39 +2 Suntooooth talk contribs (→Helpful hints: Fixed link)
diffhist Wikipedia:Reliable sources 08:39 −10 Mathglot talk contribs (Undid revision 1285185074 by Rollinginhisgrave (talk) Seems like that means we can't we publish the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors anymore, unless someone else describes them, but that is not true. Or maybe the new wording doesn't mean that, so what does it mean? In any case, I read the Talk discussion, and it doesn't okay this wording.) Tag: Undo
diffhist Wikipedia:Reliable sources 05:07 +10 Rollinginhisgrave talk contribs (→Overview: opinions of reliable sources → opinions described in reliable sources per talk) Tag: Reverted