Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
5 June 2025
- diffhist m Module:Banner shell 09:18 −39 MSGJ talk contribs (add PageAssessment for PIQA, simplify some code, remove redundant class parameter tracking)
4 June 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:Content assessment 19:32 +38 JuxtaposedJacob talk contribs (add link)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Merging 14:20 −3 Klbrain talk contribs (→Proposing a merge: 'Should'' to 'can'; there does doesn't seem to be a need for compulsion - controversial topics are well-watched, so template are more likely to be noticed.)
3 June 2025
- diffhist User talk:Iztwoz 08:10 +105 Iztwoz talk contribs (→Hippocampus scheduled for TFA: Reply) Tag: Reply
2 June 2025
- diffhist User talk:Iztwoz 14:30 +905 SchroCat talk contribs (→Hippocampus scheduled for TFA: new section) Tag: New topic
- diffhist Template:Merged-from 13:11 −683 MSGJ talk contribs (use Module:Copied, per request)
- diffhist Module:Copied 13:07 +1,800 MSGJ talk contribs (changes by User:Tule-hog to allow merge of Template:Merged-from)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team 01:59 +531 Walkerma talk contribs (Expand lede to cover main current focus)
1 June 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:Merging 18:14 +15 Mathglot talk contribs (→Proposing a merge: Let's try flipping it around, so the lead sentence of the section is about initiating a proposing a merge via discussion, which is after all, the section's main purpose. The part about a bold merge now appears just after that intro, and I think makes more sense this way.)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Merging 18:03 −9 Mathglot talk contribs (→Proposing a merge: Tweaking shortcut placement, but there are pros and cons: pro: this seems clearer and places each one next to the content it applies to; con: it places INIT and PROP below BOLD, although the latter refers only to a sentence. Might be better to rearrange the text, so that the section is described first, and bold only in a latter sentence, as it is a minor part of this section, and place BOLD below the others.)
31 May 2025
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team 02:04 0 1isall talk contribs (→Out in the real world: Grammar fixes: replaced a misplaced quotation mark with a colon. Replaced a misplaced bracket with a period.)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Merging 00:09 +30 Mathglot talk contribs (→Proposing a merge: Add BOLDMOVE shortcut in its own box, as it applies only to this first part, not the whole section as the top shortcuts do. Either that, or the alternative is to move the other two down to the second paragraph, where they are directly relevant.)