Related changes
Appearance
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
26 July 2025
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Verifiability 04:47 +1 Left guide talk contribs (→Responsibility for providing citations: added missing period)
25 July 2025
- diffhist Computer 21:09 +131 Sandstein talk contribs (→Languages: merge into section on programming languages below) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Computer 21:03 +4 Sandstein talk contribs (→Software: ce to avoid redundancy) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Computer 20:54 −83 Sandstein talk contribs (→Output devices: copyedits) Tag: Visual edit
24 July 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 23:38 −15 Horse Eye's Back talk contribs (Undid revision 1302362880 by Thegoofhere (talk) that reads as confusing to me) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 23:33 +15 Thegoofhere talk contribs (→Newspaper and magazine blogs: add) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Software testing 16:29 +1,354 116.212.185.8 talk (→History)
23 July 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 13:26 −8 S Marshall talk contribs (Rm redundant word)
22 July 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 10:55 +124 Blueboar talk contribs (Repetition of sources - Per talk) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
20 July 2025
- diffhist m Engineering 19:43 −5 Tpbradbury talk contribs (→Branches of engineering: add break)
- diffhist m Architecture 19:33 +22 Tpbradbury talk contribs (→History: add ref section)
- diffhist Architecture 19:31 −94 Tpbradbury talk contribs (see alsos already in main body of text)
19 July 2025
- diffhist Design 22:18 +210 Cl3phact0 talk contribs (re-introducing Brionvega RR126 photo (no comment concerning removal of the design vs. art text; let's keep the great photo)
- diffhist Design 22:04 −780 Ozzycabob talk contribs (I think we should just get rid of this "Relationship with the art Section entirely". It's basically just asking "Is Design considered Art?" which is just opinions. This article is focused on design. It should stay focused on design. Having at the very end "the distinction between art and design is blurry but ..." doesn't tell the reader anything. It just needlessly raises a question. Thus it should be removed) Tag: Visual edit