Related changes

23 April 2025

• diffhist Ordinary differential equation 08:36 −137 D.Lazard talk contribs (→Reduction to quadratures: Clarification)
• diffhist Ring (mathematics) 07:09 +6 D.Lazard talk contribs (→top: replacing a comma by "called" for easier reading)
• diffhist Ordinary differential equation 05:41 −37 Jak86 talk contribs (RV 2 edits.) Tag: Undo
• diffhist Ordinary differential equation 05:20 +21 196.189.144.99 talk (Ndam ode, spher part, in ንዳም ኦድ) Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• diffhist Ordinary differential equation 05:13 +16 196.189.144.99 talk Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• diffhist Equivalence class 03:54 +109 Goodphy talk contribs (Added the definition of equivalence classes in the introductory section.) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist Exponentiation 02:45 −19 ZergTwo talk contribs (Reverted good faith edits by Rob33331 (talk): Not verified in source) Tags: Twinkle Undo
• diffhist Ring (mathematics) 02:43 −59 Rcfische2 talk contribs (Rephrase again, with thanks to User Talk:24.19.113.134. More concise and direct (hopefully))
• diffhist Exponentiation 02:35 +19 Rob33331 talk contribs (→20th century: Added content) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• diffhist Ring (mathematics) 02:33 +20 24.19.113.134 talk (…or we could state the difference as concisely as is appropriate for the lede: my good-faith proposal with great thanks to the previous editor.) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• diffhist Ring (mathematics) 00:55 +1 Filozofo talk contribs (→Products and powers: Added missing space) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist Ring (mathematics) 00:51 +12 Quondum talk contribs (→Products and powers: reducing excess line height)

22 April 2025

• diffhist m Binary relation 22:04 +31 MathThrowaway talk contribs Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist Binary relation 21:59 +237 MathThrowaway talk contribs (Added graphic for binary relation) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist Lattice (order) 18:00 −105 24.84.236.163 talk (→Bounded lattice: the explanation is in the following lines, although to be fair i don't like it because it's relying on vacuous things) Tag: Manual revert
• diffhist Binary relation 16:05 −8 D.Lazard talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by Senomo Drines (talk): Reders of this article are supposed to have read the hatnote or have followed the link to set (mathematics) given in the first sentence. If you disagree, take it on the talk page) Tags: Twinkle Undo
• diffhist Binary relation 15:57 +8 Senomo Drines talk contribs (Undid revision 1286817173 by TakuyaMurata (talk) Why would a reader implicitly assume repetition of the same pair does not happen? They are not a mathematician, we are talking about the average reader. Your analogy is also odd because the phrase "set of different people" works just fine, it just means a set of people with differing characteristics.) Tag: Reverted
• diffhist Lie group 15:29 +3 D.Lazard talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by Natg 19 (talk): Wrong target; previous target has been fixed) Tags: Twinkle Undo
• diffhist Ordinary differential equation 15:24 +3 D.Lazard talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by Natg 19 (talk): Wrong target; previous target has been fixed) Tags: Twinkle Undo
• diffhist Ring (mathematics) 13:43 −12 Quondum talk contribs ("except that" is too strongly suggestive of a pinpointing of the difference, but generalization cannot be straightforwardly defined through the removal of a constraint; "but" instead just highlights a notable difference)
• diffhist Ring (mathematics) 12:45 +2 D.Lazard talk contribs (→top: typo)
• diffhist Ring (mathematics) 12:41 −160 D.Lazard talk contribs (→top: reordering phrases and sentences, simplifying wording (no need to say in the lead that addition and multiplication of integers and polynomials are the standard ones))
• diffhist Ring (mathematics) 11:51 +85 Quondum talk contribs (ce: integers are the archetype that generalizes to rings, and is a more familiar and intuitive example for the layman than fields are; different uses of "ring" are best regarded as only a different choice of terminology)
• diffhist m Groupoid 09:47 +4 TakuyaMurata talk contribs (→Group action: lk)
• diffhist Groupoid 09:47 +25 TakuyaMurata talk contribs (→Group action: main)
• diffhist Set (mathematics) 08:47 0 D.Lazard talk contribs (→Axiom of choice: {{efn}} at the end of the sentence)
• diffhist Set (mathematics) 08:43 −1 D.Lazard talk contribs (→References: renaming for avoiding duplicate headings)
• diffhist Domain (ring theory) 08:28 +20 Xxarles talk contribs (→Spectrum of an integral domain: Reverted last edit: a commutative domain is called an integral domain.) Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• diffhist Domain (ring theory) 08:23 −20 Xxarles talk contribs (→Spectrum of a domain: Deleted "integral" following the adopted denomination of domain instead of integral domain) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• diffhist Set (mathematics) 07:47 +3 Jochen Burghardt talk contribs (use 1963a,1963b to fix remaining error (BTW: there are two sections called "References"))
• diffhist Set (mathematics) 07:43 −2 Jochen Burghardt talk contribs (ref-->efn to fix error msgs) Tag: harv or sfn error
• diffhist Ring (mathematics) 07:29 +2 D.Lazard talk contribs (→top: "commutative on multiplication" is nowhere defined)
• diffhist Set (mathematics) 07:25 +769 Jochen Burghardt talk contribs (→References: add cited refs Godel,Cohen)
• diffhist Set (mathematics) 07:18 +178 Jochen Burghardt talk contribs (→Axiom of choice: suggest to mention independence (as it is somewhat surprising))
• diffhist Ring (mathematics) 05:59 +76 Goodphy talk contribs (Added the definition of the commutative rings in the introductory section.) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist Binary relation 04:50 −9 TakuyaMurata talk contribs (different is also very weird; you don't say a set of different people. You just say a set of people (since we implicitly assume there is no repetition))
• diffhist Binary relation 04:47 +33 Senomo Drines talk contribs (This is getting semantical, but I removed it regardless.)
• diffhist Binary relation 04:44 −48 TakuyaMurata talk contribs (Undid revision 1286807131 by Senomo Drines (talk) i''m very tempted to rever this; e.g., represent isn't a standard terminology) Tag: Undo
• diffhist Binary relation 03:01 +48 Senomo Drines talk contribs (Undid revision 1286726092 by D.Lazard (talk) It is still unclear whether or not it is referring to x and y as an "element" or as a "subset" of X and Y. An unknowing reader can interpret this as the cumulative set of x, y, rather than the set of differing pairs of x, y. Clarification is absolutely needed; ambiguity leads to wrongful conjecture.) Tags: Undo Reverted

21 April 2025

• diffhist m Ordinary differential equation 22:15 −3 Natg 19 talk contribs (Disambiguating links to Quadrature (link changed to Numerical integration) using DisamAssist.) Tag: Reverted
• diffhist m Lie group 22:12 −3 Natg 19 talk contribs (Disambiguating links to Quadrature (link changed to Numerical integration) using DisamAssist.) Tag: Reverted
• diffhist Automaton 21:23 −536 Seefooddiet talk contribs (→Renaissance and early modern: ditto) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist Automaton 21:22 −405 Seefooddiet talk contribs (→History: MOS:SANDWICH) Tag: Visual edit
• diffhist Binary relation 16:36 −48 D.Lazard talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by Senomo Drines (talk): "x in S" is not vague. It the standard way to say that x is an element of of the set S. You can verify this by reading any text on mathematical sets) Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
• diffhist m Empty set 16:03 −1,043 Langusto talk contribs (Reverted edit by 85.249.21.167 (talk) to last version by AllCatsAreGrey) Tags: Rollback SWViewer [1.6]
• diffhist Empty set 16:02 +1,043 85.249.21.167 talk (→Properties: ,,,,,,,) Tags: Reverted possible vandalism Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• diffhist Binary relation 15:40 +48 Senomo Drines talk contribs (If clarification is needed, then x and y should clarify to be elements, being "in" a set is uncomfortably vague.) Tag: Reverted
• diffhist Binary relation 14:48 −264 D.Lazard talk contribs (Undid revision 1286707691 by Senomo Drines (talk) this change is very confusing as relying on undefined (in this context) concepts of combination and pairing. Added twice "some" for clarification)
• diffhist Binary relation 14:27 +275 Senomo Drines talk contribs (Its difficult to differentiate whether it is talking about the elements of a set or the pairing between the elements of the sets.)
• diffhist Total order 14:08 +6 JRSpriggs talk contribs (→Strict and non-strict total orders: switch paragraphs to avoid confusing wording.)