Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
5 June 2025
- diffhist Sri Lanka 17:48 +216 AimanAbir18plus talk contribs (ce) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Sri Lanka 17:43 0 AimanAbir18plus talk contribs (89th HDI (not 78th)) Tag: Visual edit
4 June 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reliable sources 20:11 −2 Butwhatdoiknow talk contribs (→Scholarship: copy edit)
- diffhist University of Peradeniya 15:46 +317 Hitesh Thakrani talk contribs (QS Asia rank added for 2025) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Wikipedia:Merging 14:20 −3 Klbrain talk contribs (→Proposing a merge: 'Should'' to 'can'; there does doesn't seem to be a need for compulsion - controversial topics are well-watched, so template are more likely to be noticed.)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reliable sources 13:34 −4 Gog the Mild talk contribs (Copy edit)
3 June 2025
- diffhist Kandy 15:35 +19 2402:d000:810c:576c:cd19:2380:51d:714c talk
- diffhist Kandy 15:35 −503 2402:d000:810c:576c:cd19:2380:51d:714c talk (→Government) Tag: references removed
2 June 2025
- diffhist m Sri Lanka 13:02 +422 Jonesey95 talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by Ohconfucius (talk) to last revision by Red Slash) Tags: Twinkle Undo
1 June 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:Merging 18:14 +15 Mathglot talk contribs (→Proposing a merge: Let's try flipping it around, so the lead sentence of the section is about initiating a proposing a merge via discussion, which is after all, the section's main purpose. The part about a bold merge now appears just after that intro, and I think makes more sense this way.)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Merging 18:03 −9 Mathglot talk contribs (→Proposing a merge: Tweaking shortcut placement, but there are pros and cons: pro: this seems clearer and places each one next to the content it applies to; con: it places INIT and PROP below BOLD, although the latter refers only to a sentence. Might be better to rearrange the text, so that the section is described first, and bold only in a latter sentence, as it is a minor part of this section, and place BOLD below the others.)
31 May 2025
- diffhist Help:Maintenance template removal 22:49 −1 Alalch E. talk contribs (→When to remove: rm blank)
- diffhist Help:Maintenance template removal 22:49 +108 Alalch E. talk contribs (anchors)
- diffhist m Sri Lanka 16:57 −422 Ohconfucius talk contribs (Script-assisted style fixes and per CS1, EngvarB, script-assisted date audit and style fixes per MOS:NUM) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Merging 00:09 +30 Mathglot talk contribs (→Proposing a merge: Add BOLDMOVE shortcut in its own box, as it applies only to this first part, not the whole section as the top shortcuts do. Either that, or the alternative is to move the other two down to the second paragraph, where they are directly relevant.)