Related changes
Appearance
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
12 July 2025
- diffhist Digital signature 08:30 +95 Buuzbashi talk contribs (→Definition) Tag: Visual edit
10 July 2025
- diffhist Cryptography 21:21 −3 Maxeto0910 talk contribs Tag: Visual edit
9 July 2025
- diffhist Quadratic residue 01:35 −3 Taylor Riastradh Campbell talk contribs (→Cryptography: Link to Rabin signature as a better example of factoring-based cryptography than the broken textbook encryption scheme.)
- diffhist RSA problem 01:33 −3 Taylor Riastradh Campbell talk contribs (→See also: Link to Rabin signature, whose security is more meaningful than that of the broken textbook encryption scheme.)
7 July 2025
- diffhist Michael O. Rabin 22:55 +517 Taylor Riastradh Campbell talk contribs (→Career: Link to the secure public-key signature scheme Rabin did invent, not to the broken public-key encryption scheme he didn't but has been attributed to him in various textbook counterexamples. Spruce up the citation. Fix the year: first published in 1978, not in 1979.)
- diffhist Digital signature 22:15 −4,285 Taylor Riastradh Campbell talk contribs (Remove unnecessary duplication of Electronic signatures and law article. It isn't really useful here and it certainly shouldn't clutter up the lead. Two sources were used elsewhere -- move them there for now (though they don't support the claims, are from the unreliable sources of commercial marketing copy, and need to be replaced -- TBD in separate changes).)
- diffhist Digital signature 21:44 −1,162 Taylor Riastradh Campbell talk contribs (Remove obviously nonsense claim and the two citations which were added to support the claim in spite of the fact that they do not, in fact, support it.)